How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A finite endpoint of a maximal unit-speed geodesic produces a Cauchy curve
Statement
Let be a Riemannian manifold, let be a nonempty open interval with , and let be a unit-speed geodesic. Let be the connected component containing its image, and let be the Riemannian distance of the restricted metric on . Then is Cauchy as , in the explicit sense that for every there is such that
In particular this holds at a finite right endpoint of the maximal interval of a maximal unit-speed geodesic. By reversing the parameter, the analogous statement holds as when .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The manifold, interval, component, and unit-speed geodesic in the statement.
Connected components of a manifold are open (Components of a topological manifold are open and at most countable), so inherits a connected Riemannian-manifold structure. A path component lies in a connected component (Every path-connected space is connected, and every path component lies inside a component).
Riemannian distance on a connected manifold defines as the infimum of lengths of piecewise- curves in , Riemannian distance is a metric makes it symmetric, and Length dominates endpoint distance gives endpoint distance at most the length of any such curve.
For a curve, Riemannian speed and length gives .
Proof
Fix . For every , the restriction of between and , affinely reparametrized to , is a path from to . Thus the image of lies in the path component of and hence in the single connected component ; openness from [F1] makes every restricted segment a curve in the Riemannian manifold .
If are in , the unit-speed hypothesis and [F3] give Applying [F2] in therefore yields The same inequality for follows by interchanging the two parameters, and equality of the parameters gives distance zero.
Let and put . Both entries of the maximum are less than , so . If , then ; step 2.1 gives . This is exactly the displayed Cauchy condition.
Maximality was not needed, so the special case for a maximal geodesic is immediate. If , the curve is again unit speed on , and step 3.1 at its finite right endpoint gives the stated left-endpoint version. The empty manifold admits no curve with nonempty domain; in dimension zero there is no unit-speed curve, while dimension one is covered unchanged. The assumptions and exclude an empty source and an infinite endpoint; arbitrarily small positive is handled explicitly. No choice principle is used: is one fixed witness from the given nonempty interval and is a formula.
Remarks
- Andrews writes the estimate and immediately concludes that is Cauchy as approaches the finite endpoint in the proof of Theorem 11.5.1. The proof above spells out its quantifiers and makes distance well defined even when the ambient manifold is disconnected.
- The original scaffold listed constant speed as a dependency, but unit speed is already a hypothesis. No constant-speed theorem is used here.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ben Andrews, Geodesics and Completeness, proof of Theorem 11.5.1, printed p.106 (standard reference, not scraped)