How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A fixed point free ball map produces a boundary retraction
Statement
For , a continuous fixed-point-free map would produce a continuous retraction by following the ray from through to the boundary.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement above.
Proof
Put , , , and . Since , this is an upward quadratic with and . Its larger root is The discriminant is nonnegative and implies .
Set . The nonzero denominator and the continuous square root of a nonnegative continuous function make and continuous. The root equation gives , so has the required target. No differentiability or uniform lower bound on the denominator is needed.
If , then and : equality in would force , excluded by hypothesis. Thus is the larger root and . This proves the retraction property, also on the two endpoints when .
Used by
- Brouwer fixed point theorem Theorem
Dependency tree · 0 levels
Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.
Sources
- Miller, Algebraic Topology I lecture notes, Theorem 10.7 proof, p.24 (standard reference, not scraped)