Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-09-23 (gpt-6-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A generic projection can preserve properness

Statement

Let F=(g,ρ):M→RN×R be a smooth embedding such that g(M) is bounded and ρ is proper. If a unit vector u∈SN is not parallel to the last-coordinate axis and lies outside the secant and tangent direction images of F, then the orthogonal projection Pu∘F is a proper injective immersion.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth embedding F=(g,ρ):M→RN×R with g(M) bounded and ρ proper.

[F1]

Secant directions are normalized differences of distinct image points, and tangent directions are normalized images of nonzero tangent vectors (Secant and tangent direction maps of a Euclidean embedding).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1givenalgebra

The kernel of the orthogonal projection Pu is Ru. If distinct points p,q collapsed, then F(p)−F(q) would be a nonzero scalar multiple of u, making u a secant direction up to sign, contrary to the hypothesis. If the differential killed a nonzero tangent vector v, then dFp(v) would lie in Ru; since F is an immersion, this vector is nonzero and makes u a tangent direction up to sign. Thus Pu∘F is injective and immersive directly from [F1], with no generic-existence theorem invoked.

1.2givenconstructalgebra

Let e=(0,1) be the last-coordinate unit vector and put e′:=Pu(e). The hypothesis that u is not parallel to e is exactly e′≠0. Decompose u⊥=Re′⊕(e′)⊥. Since Pu(F(p))=Pu(g(p),0)+ρ(p)e′, its (e′)⊥-component is bounded. Its scalar component along e′/∥e′∥ is ρ′(p)=∥e′∥ρ(p)+b(p), where b is bounded.

2.1step 1.2given

The function ρ′ is proper. Indeed, if J⊆R is compact and ∣b∣≤B, then ρ′(p)∈J forces ρ(p) into a bounded closed interval because ∥e′∥>0. Thus (ρ′)−1(J) is a closed subset of the inverse image under the proper map ρ of a compact interval.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1∎

If K⊆u⊥ is compact, its image under the linear coordinate along e′ is compact. Hence (Pu∘F)−1(K) is a closed subset of the compact set (ρ′)−1(pr⁡e′K) and is compact. Therefore Pu∘F is proper. Together with step 1.1, it is a proper injective immersion.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources