How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An absolutely continuous upper quantile has its specified tail mass
Statement
Let be a real random variable whose law is absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue measure on . For , define
Then is finite and
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A real random variable with an absolutely continuous law and .
Countable Choice is used by the published singleton-null result, which is the only reason for an axiom assumption here (The Axiom of Countable Choice (), Every at most countable subset of is Lebesgue null; in particular ).
Absolute continuity means every Lebesgue-null Borel set has probability zero (Absolute continuity of a signed or complex measure with respect to a positive measure).
Every singleton in is Lebesgue null under Countable Choice (Every at most countable subset of is Lebesgue null; in particular ).
A probability measure has total mass one and is continuous from below and from above; the latter applies because the first term has mass at most one (Probability measures and probability spaces, Continuity from below for measures, Continuity from above when one set has finite measure).
Every nonempty subset of that is bounded above has a finite least upper bound (The Cauchy-sequence reals have the least-upper-bound property).
Proof
Given: Countable Choice, a real random variable with an absolutely continuous law, and .
For each , the event is measurable and its singleton is Lebesgue null by [F2]. Absolute continuity [F1] gives . Therefore, if , the events decrease to and [F3] gives . If with , these events increase to , so [F3] gives convergence to . Thus the nonincreasing tail function is continuous at every .
As , the events decrease to the empty set and increase to the whole sample space. By [F3], and . Since , the set is nonempty and bounded above; [F4] gives its finite supremum. Continuity of makes closed, so that supremum belongs to .
If , continuity at would give some with , contradicting that is an upper bound for . Hence . Step 1.1 gives , so .
Depends on
- Random elements and real random variables
- Probability measures and probability spaces
- Absolute continuity of a signed or complex measure with respect to a positive measure
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Every at most countable subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ is Lebesgue null; in particular $\lambda_1(\mathbb{Q})=0$
- Continuity from below for measures
- Continuity from above when one set has finite measure
- The Cauchy-sequence reals have the least-upper-bound property
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
36 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gábor Lugosi and Shahar Mendelson, Robust Multivariate Mean Estimation: The Optimality of Trimmed Mean, §2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Gábor Lugosi, Mean Estimation in High Dimension, §2 (standard reference, not scraped)