How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A singular AdaGrad metric still has a projection minimizer
Statement
Let , let be nonempty, bounded, closed, and convex, let be a fixed real positive-semidefinite matrix, and let . The function attains a minimum on . This conclusion allows to be singular and makes no uniqueness claim.
Statement references
Gram-matrix AdaGrad with full or singular diagonal metrics: the AdaGrad update uses this quadratic objective with and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonempty bounded closed convex , a fixed positive-semidefinite matrix , and .
Gram-matrix AdaGrad with full or singular diagonal metrics: the metric projection objective is , with positive semidefinite; its minimizer may be nonunique.
The Euclidean inner product on : , so each coordinate satisfies .
Upper and lower semicontinuity on subsets of : every continuous real-valued function on a Euclidean subset is lower semicontinuous there.
Semicontinuous extreme value theorem on compact Euclidean sets: a real-valued lower semicontinuous function on a nonempty compact Euclidean set attains its minimum.
Heine-Borel in : with the Euclidean metric a subset of is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line: in finite-dimensional Euclidean space, a set is compact if it is closed and bounded.
Proof
By [F5], the nonempty closed bounded set is compact.
Since is bounded, choose with for every , and put . For , expanding the finite matrix products and factoring each difference gives . Thus , by [F2]; hence is continuous on .
By [F3], is lower semicontinuous on . Apply [F4] to the nonempty compact set in step 1.1 to obtain a minimizer. No step requires to be invertible, and the argument does not distinguish or select a unique minimizer.
Depends on
- Gram-matrix AdaGrad with full or singular diagonal metrics
- The Euclidean inner product $\langle x,y\rangle = \sum_{k<n} x_k y_k$ on $\mathbb{R}^n$
- Upper and lower semicontinuity on subsets of $\mathbb R^n$
- Semicontinuous extreme value theorem on compact Euclidean sets
- Heine-Borel in $\mathbb{R}^n$: with the Euclidean metric a subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line
Used by
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Gram-matrix AdaGrad with full or singular diagonal metrics.
Dependency tree · two levels
56 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Elad Hazan, Introduction to Online Convex Optimization, second edition (standard reference, not scraped)
- John Duchi, Elad Hazan, and Yoram Singer, Adaptive Subgradient Methods for Online Learning and Stochastic Optimization (standard reference, not scraped)