Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The adjugate gives an explicit inverse formula over a field

Statement

Let F be a field, q≥1, and M∈Fq×q. Let adj⁡(M) be the adjugate defined by the cofactors of Deleted-row-and-column minors, cofactors, the cofactor matrix and the adjugate over a commutative ring. Then

Madj⁡(M)=det⁡(M)Iq.

Consequently, when det⁡(M)≠0, M−1=adj⁡(M)/det⁡(M); when det⁡(M)=0, M is singular.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field F, positive integer q, and matrix M∈Fq×q.

[F1]

Deleted-row-and-column minors, cofactors, the cofactor matrix and the adjugate over a commutative ring: Rows and columns are indexed by 0,…,q−1; Cjk(M)=(−1)j+kdet⁡(M(j,k)) and adj⁡(M)=cof⁡(M)T, with the 0×0 determinant equal to 1 when q=1.

[F2]

Laplace expansion computes the determinant along every row and every column over a commutative ring: With zero-based indices, expanding along row j gives det⁡(M)=∑k=0q−1mjkCjk(M).

[F4]

A finite-dimensional linear operator over a field is invertible if and only if its determinant is nonzero: A finite-dimensional linear operator over a field is invertible if and only if its determinant is nonzero.

Proof

1.1F1algebra

For 0≤i,j<q, [F1] makes the (i,j) entry of Madj⁡(M) equal to ∑k=0q−1mikCjk(M).

2.1F2F3step 1.1algebra

If i=j, this sum is det⁡(M) by [F2]. If i≠j, let M′ be obtained by replacing row j of M with row i. Deleting row j leaves each cofactor unchanged, so expansion of det⁡(M′) along row j gives the sum in step 1.1. The matrix M′ has equal rows i and j, so [F3] makes that determinant zero. Thus every diagonal entry of Madj⁡(M) is det⁡(M) and every off-diagonal entry is zero.

3.1F4step 2.1algebra∎

If det⁡(M)≠0, [F4] gives M−1, and multiplying the identity in step 2.1 on the left by M−1/det⁡(M) gives adj⁡(M)/det⁡(M)=M−1. If det⁡(M)=0, [F4] says M is not invertible, which is exactly singularity for a square matrix.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources