How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An affine cone homotopy from the diagonal to the front-back shuffle
Statement
Put . Work with finite integral chains generated by affine maps from standard simplices into this convex polytope, retaining degenerate generators and using alternating face boundary. Let be the diagonal affine simplex and let where is the signed shuffle product into the two factors of . There are specified finite affine -chains in , with , such that for every For the right side is zero and . The chains are given by a recursion using only affine cones, hence require no AC. The equation remains valid after pulling back any smooth form supplied on a neighbourhood of in its affine span and integrating the affine simplices; no manifold structure on the corners of is required.
Facts & Assumptions
The standard topological simplex and its affine face maps gives the vertices and ordered face maps.
Alexander–Whitney map and diagonal approximation gives the front/back sum, its chain-map identity and its naturality for postcomposition.
The singular chain cross product on generators gives the signed affine shuffle simplices.
The singular chain cross product satisfies the boundary formula gives their signed tensor-boundary identity.
Integral of a form over a smooth singular simplex defines integrals using a smooth extension.
Stokes theorem for the standard simplex proves the simplex Stokes identity.
Proof
Given: as stated. An affine simplex denotes its ordered vertex parametrization, even when vertices repeat or are affinely dependent.
Affine simplices and their faces stay in by convexity. Postcomposition by an affine map commutes with the alternating boundary, term by term. The face identities give : deleting vertices in positions occurs once with sign and once with sign . By [F2], [F3] and [F4], both and have boundary equal to the alternating sum of their corresponding face-model chains. Explicitly, with , The shuffle formula commutes with the since each of its affine vertex lists is postcomposed unchanged.
Fix the vertex of and define its affine cone , extended linearly. Deleting the first vertex gives the input simplex. Deleting vertex gives minus the cone on its th face. Thus for every positive-degree chain , For degree-zero chains the formula is , where is the sum of coefficients. All these chains are finite and affine, including cones on degenerate simplices.
Set , since the sole shuffle gives . Suppose the chains through have been defined with the displayed identity, and put For , step 1.1 gives , so . For , substitute the already proved boundary of into . The terms involving cancel by step 1.1. The remaining double sum is zero: each omitted pair of vertices occurs in the two orders with opposite alternating signs, and both coordinate factors use the same composite face map. Therefore in all cases .
Define . Since has positive degree and is a cycle, step 2.1 gives , exactly the claimed equation. This recursion specifies a unique chosen formula, not a unique possible filling: the cone vertex, signs and face chains have all been fixed. At each degree only finitely many faces and finite chains occur. Induction therefore defines every without making selections from families of possible fillers.
A smooth form supplied on a neighbourhood of in its affine span pulls back by any of these affine simplex maps to a locally extendible form on the standard simplex. Integration in [F5] is linear, so the chain equation can be integrated term by term. Independence from an ambient extension follows because two extensions agree, with all their derivatives, on the interior of and by continuity on its closure. The affine span has dimension zero only when , where integration is evaluation and the equation is already zero. Applying the simplex Stokes clause of [F6] to each affine summand is legitimate regardless of its rank; no Stokes theorem on a manifold with corners has been assumed.
The zero input chain and empty finite sum give zero throughout. At there is no face term and ; the first positive degree uses the separate cycle verification in step 3.1. Repeated vertices and endpoint faces were retained in the face and cone identities. Every coefficient and map in the recursion is specified, so neither countable nor arbitrary choice is used.
Depends on
- The standard topological simplex and its affine face maps
- Alexander–Whitney map and diagonal approximation
- The singular chain cross product on generators
- The singular chain cross product satisfies the boundary formula
- Integral of a form over a smooth singular simplex
- Stokes theorem for the standard simplex
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, section 3.2; affine-cone specialization of the diagonal comparison (standard reference, not scraped)