How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The arc-length function is continuous and nondecreasing, with increments equal to subpath lengths; it is strictly increasing exactly when no nondegenerate subpath is constant
Statement
Let be rectifiable and let . Then is continuous and nondecreasing. Moreover, is strictly increasing if and only if is constant on no nondegenerate subinterval of .
On a singleton interval, continuity and nondecrease hold and the strictness equivalence is vacuous on both sides.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The rectifiable path and its arc-length function.
For , is the nonnegative length of the restricted path (The arc-length function of a rectifiable path, Arc length is additive across every subdivision point and decreases under restriction).
Every coordinate has bounded variation, the length of a restriction is at most the sum of its coordinate variations, and variation is additive on adjacent subintervals; hence for (A path in is rectifiable exactly when every coordinate has bounded variation, Total variation is additive over adjacent subintervals and decreases under restriction).
The variation function of a bounded-variation function is continuous at every point where the function is continuous (The jumps of a variation function equal the absolute jumps of the original function).
A path of length zero is constant (Every endpoint chord is no longer than the arc: ).
Proof
From [L1], whenever , so is nondecreasing.
Let . Each is continuous by [L2], [L3], and continuity of the path's coordinates.
If for some , [L1] says the intervening path has length zero, and [L4] makes it constant on .
For , [L1] and [L2] give . The finite sum on the right tends to zero as , from either permitted side, so is continuous.
Conversely, if is constant on , every polygonal sum there is zero, so [L1] gives . Thus equality at distinct arguments occurs exactly on a constant subinterval, proving the strictness equivalence.
Depends on
- The arc-length function $s_\gamma(t)=L(\gamma|_{[a,t]})$ of a rectifiable path
- Arc length is additive across every subdivision point and decreases under restriction
- A path in $\mathbb{R}^n$ is rectifiable exactly when every coordinate has bounded variation
- Total variation is additive over adjacent subintervals and decreases under restriction
- The jumps of a variation function equal the absolute jumps of the original function
- Every endpoint chord is no longer than the arc: $\lVert\gamma(b)-\gamma(a)\rVert_2\le L(\gamma)$
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 111 results over 20 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- T. M. Apostol, Mathematical Analysis, Theorem 6.19 (standard reference, not scraped)