Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Armijo backtracking terminates for strict descent directions

Statement

For either backtracking procedure in Gradient descent and Damped Newton method, suppose the objective is differentiable at a point x of an open domain and the current direction p satisfies Df(x)[p]<0. If the line search starts at t=1, uses a factor β∈(0,1), and accepts when f(x+tp)≤f(x)+αt Df(x)[p] for a fixed α∈(0,1), it accepts after finitely many reductions. For the Newton branch, assume the current Hessian is symmetric positive definite.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An open U⊆Rd, a Fréchet differentiable f:U→R, x∈U, α,β∈(0,1), and a direction p with Df(x)[p]<0; for the Newton branch, a symmetric positive-definite Hessian.

[F1]

Gradient descent: its backtracking branch uses p=−∇f(x), starts at t=1, multiplies rejected steps by β, and checks the Armijo inequality.

[F2]

Damped Newton method: its direction solves H(x)p=−∇f(x) using Cholesky when H(x) is symmetric positive definite, and its line search uses the same geometric backtracking rule.

[F5]

Bernoulli's inequality (1+x)n≥1+nx: (1+c)n≥1+nc for c≥0 and n∈N.

[F6]

Every complete ordered field is Archimedean: the natural numbers are cofinal in R.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3F4givenalgebra

By linearity of Df(x) and its values on the standard basis, Df(x)[p]=⟨∇f(x),p⟩. In the gradient branch, if ∇f(x)≠0, then Df(x)[−∇f(x)]=−∥∇f(x)∥2<0 by [F1]. In the Newton branch, write g=∇f(x) and Hp=−g. If g≠0, then p≠0 by [F4] and Df(x)[p]=gTp=−pTHp<0, since H is symmetric positive definite by [F2] and [F4].

1.2F3givenchoose

Set d:=−Df(x)[p]>0. Fréchet differentiability gives [f(x+tp)−f(x)]/t→−d as t↓0. Choose δ>0 small enough that x+tp∈U and this quotient is less than −d+(1−α)d/2=−(1+α)d/2≤−αd whenever 0<t<δ. Then every such trial satisfies the Armijo test.

1.3F5F6givenalgebra

The trials are tn=βn. Put c=β−1−1>0. By [F5], β−n=(1+c)n≥1+nc, hence tn≤(1+nc)−1. By [F6], for any δ>0 some n is large enough that (1+nc)−1<δ; thus tn→0.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3∎

Step 1.2 supplies a positive interval of accepted trial sizes. The geometric sequence shown in step 1.3 eventually tests such a size, so the prescribed loop accepts after finitely many reductions in either algorithm.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Damped Newton method and Gradient descent.

Dependency tree · two levels

29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources