How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Armijo backtracking terminates for strict descent directions
Statement
For either backtracking procedure in Gradient descent and Damped Newton method, suppose the objective is differentiable at a point of an open domain and the current direction satisfies . If the line search starts at , uses a factor , and accepts when for a fixed , it accepts after finitely many reductions. For the Newton branch, assume the current Hessian is symmetric positive definite.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An open , a Fréchet differentiable , , , and a direction with ; for the Newton branch, a symmetric positive-definite Hessian.
Gradient descent: its backtracking branch uses , starts at , multiplies rejected steps by , and checks the Armijo inequality.
Damped Newton method: its direction solves using Cholesky when is symmetric positive definite, and its line search uses the same geometric backtracking rule.
The real Frechet derivative on real and complex matrix spaces with the Frobenius norm: is real-linear; The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case defines the gradient by the partial derivatives in the standard basis.
A matrix admits a Cholesky factorisation with positive diagonal exactly when it is Hermitian positive definite, and that factor is unique: a symmetric positive-definite Hessian has an invertible Cholesky factor.
Bernoulli's inequality : for and .
Every complete ordered field is Archimedean: the natural numbers are cofinal in .
Proof
By linearity of and its values on the standard basis, . In the gradient branch, if , then by [F1]. In the Newton branch, write and . If , then by [F4] and , since is symmetric positive definite by [F2] and [F4].
Set . Fréchet differentiability gives as . Choose small enough that and this quotient is less than whenever . Then every such trial satisfies the Armijo test.
The trials are . Put . By [F5], , hence . By [F6], for any some is large enough that ; thus .
Step 1.2 supplies a positive interval of accepted trial sizes. The geometric sequence shown in step 1.3 eventually tests such a size, so the prescribed loop accepts after finitely many reductions in either algorithm.
Depends on
- Damped Newton method
- Gradient descent
- The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case
- The real Frechet derivative on real and complex matrix spaces with the Frobenius norm
- Bernoulli's inequality $(1+x)^n \ge 1 + nx$
- A matrix admits a Cholesky factorisation with positive diagonal exactly when it is Hermitian positive definite, and that factor is unique
- Every complete ordered field is Archimedean
Used by
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Damped Newton method and Gradient descent.
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Stephen Boyd and Lieven Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization (standard reference, not scraped)