How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Gradient descent rate under strong convexity and smoothness
Statement
Let be continuously differentiable and have an attained minimum . Say that is -smooth when for all , and -strongly convex when If and Gradient descent uses the fixed step , then the initial gap is unchanged at , and for every generated iterate with integer , For , the factor is zero only for the stated range; no convention is used.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A continuously differentiable with attained minimum , a gradient Lipschitz constant , a strong convexity constant , and iterates from Gradient descent with step .
-smooth means the displayed gradient Lipschitz bound in the Statement.
-strong convexity means the displayed quadratic lower bound in the Statement.
Gradient descent in fixed-step mode updates whenever it does not stop at .
The real Frechet derivative on real and complex matrix spaces with the Frobenius norm: is real-linear. The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case defines the gradient by coordinate partials. Since a linear map is determined by its values on the standard basis, .
The chain rule for total derivatives: : differentiating a composition with the line composes the total derivative with .
A continuous function on is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion: a continuous real function on a compact interval is Riemann integrable.
Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on , differentiability on , and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative: a continuous scalar function on a closed interval whose interior derivative has an integrable extension has endpoint increment equal to the integral of that derivative.
Proof
Fix and write and . Define on . By [F2]–[F3], on . The gradient is continuous by [A1], so is continuous and integrable by [F4]. Applying [F5] gives By [A1] and [F6], , whence . Integrating this bound gives
By [A2], for every , Taking and using nonnegativity of the square yields .
Apply steps 1.1 and 1.2 at and use [F1]. Then The factor is nonnegative because .
The case is equality. For , the result is step 2.1 whenever is generated. If is generated, then was generated and the algorithm made the th update; multiplying the bound at by and applying step 2.1 proves it at . Induction along generated iterates gives the claim for every generated . If the stopping rule fires earlier, no later iterate is asserted.
Depends on
- Gradient descent
- The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case
- The real Frechet derivative on real and complex matrix spaces with the Frobenius norm
- Cauchy-Schwarz $\lvert\langle x,y\rangle\rvert \le \lVert x\rVert_2\lVert y\rVert_2$ with its equality case, the triangle inequality for $\lVert\cdot\rVert_2$, the parallelogram law and polarisation
- The chain rule for total derivatives: $D(g\circ f)(a)=Dg(f(a))\circ Df(a)$
- A continuous function on $[a,b]$ is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion
- Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on $[a,b]$, differentiability on $(a,b)$, and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
48 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Stephen Boyd and Lieven Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization (standard reference, not scraped)