How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Artin's fixed-field lower bound
Statement
If is a finite group of automorphisms of , then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , a finite group of automorphisms of , and its fixed field (The fixed field of a group of field automorphisms).
Every finite family of distinct group homomorphisms is linearly independent over as a family of functions (Dedekind's linear independence theorem for distinct characters).
Proof
Restricted to , the distinct automorphisms are distinct characters , so [L1] makes them linearly independent as functions. Hence their evaluation vectors span : otherwise a nonzero linear functional on their span would give a nontrivial -linear relation among the . Choose nonzero such that the evaluation matrix is invertible. For , one may take .
Suppose satisfy . Applying each and using gives , so invertibility of forces every . Thus are linearly independent over .
A -linearly independent family of elements of gives .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Fields and Galois Theory, v5.10, Theorem 3.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- K. Conrad, The Galois Correspondence, Section 5 (standard reference, not scraped)