How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Generic regularity and orientability for the sign-fixed self-dual moduli problem
Statement
Assume full AC. Let be a closed simply connected oriented Riemannian four-manifold with positive-definite intersection form, and let be an -bundle with . Complete the connections in and the gauge transformations in , and use the unbased irreducible configuration quotient. The curvature section takes values in its equation bundle. Choose an open subset covered by finitely many bounded Coulomb slice balls centered at smooth irreducible connections, and an open whose closure is contained in the union of strictly smaller closed balls in these charts, their images lying in .
Allow smooth gauge-equivariant perturbation sections supported in , whose slice representatives are smooth -valued maps with finite uniform norm on the specified chart balls. Interpret them in the equation bundle by inclusion. Give this class the topology of the uniform section norm on those finitely many balls together with convergence of the section and its slice derivative uniformly on compact subsets. The perturbations for which is transverse to zero at every zero in form an open dense subset. Their zero sets in are smooth orientable five-manifolds, and the real determinant line of the gauge-fixed deformation family is orientable on the irreducible quotient. The based quotient may be used to pull back this orientation; it carries an additional framing fiber and is not the unbased five-dimensional moduli space.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
The sign-fixed equation is , with unbased real operator and charge . Sign-fixed self-dual moduli and deformation setup
Its real index is , with full AC. Here and , so the index is five. Index formula for the sign-fixed self-dual deformation operator
The actual high-Sobolev slice construction gives a smooth unbased quotient and equation bundle; the based quotient is a principal framing bundle. High-Sobolev Coulomb slices and the framed quotient of irreducible SU(2) connections
On the stated finite slice collars, bounded smoothing perturbations give an open dense transverse class in exactly the specified topology, and their regular zero sets have dimension equal to the unbased index. Bounded smoothing perturbations give open dense transversality on finite ASD slice collars
The real determinant family is gauge-equivariantly orientable on a closed simply connected oriented four-manifold, and this persists under compact perturbations and induces the orientation of a regular zero set. Gauge-equivariant orientability of the real SU(2) ASD determinant line
Full AC is used through the analytic, finite-model, Bott and obstruction suppliers. The Axiom of Choice
Proof
Given: Full AC, the manifold and bundle, and the actual Sobolev, slice-collar and perturbation conditions of the Statement.
By [F3], the quotient and equation bundle are smooth in the stated spaces. In a slice centered at the equation is . The derivative of each allowed perturbation factors through the compact inclusion , and [F4] proves Fredholmness of the slice derivative with the same index as [F1]. Formula [F2] gives that index as five.
Apply [F4] with the exact finite larger and smaller slice balls in the Statement. Its compact zero-container follows from the uniform bound on nearby perturbation values: in each smaller slice ball the curvature equation and give a uniform bound on the solution , hence compactness in . Compact-set derivative control then preserves surjectivity at the remaining zeros. Density follows from finite cokernel-complement perturbations and finite-dimensional Sard. Thus the claimed set is open dense, and its zero set in is a smooth five-manifold by step 1.1.
By [F5], the unperturbed real determinant line is orientable with every gauge transformation preserving the orientation. Scaling the compact perturbation derivative from zero to its actual value preserves this property. At a transverse zero the kernel of the slice derivative is the moduli tangent space and its cokernel is zero, so the determinant orientation gives a tangent orientation. The extra scalar gauge block is invertible and has its fixed orientation. Therefore the actual unbased moduli manifold is orientable. The based quotient only pulls this construction back and adds the three framing directions described in [F3]; it is not used to change the index in step 1.1. This proves all conclusions.
Source notes
The complete source proof on Donaldson's printed pp.288–295 was read, including the exponents, the perturbations valued in with equation target , Lemma 9 and Lemma 10. This replaces a defective previous formalization, not the mathematical theorem by an easier special case. A nonempty open subset of an infinite-dimensional Hilbert manifold cannot have compact closure: in a contained coordinate ball, an orthonormal sequence at a fixed small radius has no convergent subsequence. Thus the previous phrase “relatively compact open set” did not express the finite bounded slice collars used in the source. Uniform control of the smoothing section value is the compactness mechanism for openness; arbitrary compact derivatives with only compact-open control do not supply that mechanism. The previous based-quotient wording also omitted its three framing directions. The three actual suppliers prove the corrected analytic operation and the original orientability conclusion, with full AC stated explicitly.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Simon K. Donaldson, An Application of Gauge Theory to the Topology of 4-Manifolds (standard reference, not scraped)