How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
For the following are equivalent: is a basis; is a maximal linearly independent subset of ; is a minimal spanning subset of — maximality and minimality being in the inclusion order
Statement
Let be a vector space over a field (Vector space over a field). Let be the set of linearly independent subsets of (Linear independence: a finite list is independent when forces every , and a subset is independent when every injective finite list into is independent) and the set of spanning subsets of (Linear combination of a finite list, and the span as the smallest linear subspace containing ), each partially ordered by inclusion (Partial order and partially ordered set). For the following are equivalent.
- (a) is a basis of (Basis of a vector space: a linearly independent spanning subset; and ordered basis: an injective finite list whose image is a basis).
- (b) is a maximal element of (Maximal element and greatest element): is linearly independent, and no linearly independent satisfies .
- (c) is a minimal element of : spans , and no spanning satisfies .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , a vector space over , and a subset .
is a basis of when is linearly independent and (Basis of a vector space: a linearly independent spanning subset; and ordered basis: an injective finite list whose image is a basis).
A subset is linearly dependent if and only if some lies in (A subset is linearly dependent if and only if some lies in ; and is already the set of linear combinations of INJECTIVE finite lists into ).
If is linearly independent and , then and is linearly independent (If is linearly independent and then is linearly independent and ; and if then ).
Every subset of a linearly independent subset of is linearly independent (Finite sums re-indexed along an injection, with a zero term deleted, and concatenated; and the closure properties of linear independence: an independent list is injective and never , its sublists are independent, a list is independent exactly when it is injective with linearly independent image, and every subset of a linearly independent set is linearly independent, claim 7).
is a linear subspace of containing and contained in every linear subspace of containing ; and implies (Linear combination of a finite list, and the span as the smallest linear subspace containing , The span is monotone and idempotent, exactly when is a linear subspace, and , Linear subspace of a vector space).
Inclusion is a partial order, and is maximal in a poset when no element is strictly above it, minimal when no element is strictly below it (Partial order and partially ordered set, Maximal element and greatest element).
Proof
(a) implies (b). Let be a basis, so is linearly independent and . Suppose some linearly independent satisfies , and pick . Then , so is linearly independent. On the other hand , and because , so is linearly dependent. These contradict each other, so no such exists and is maximal in the inclusion order on the linearly independent subsets.
(b) implies (a). Let be maximal among the linearly independent subsets of . If some had , then would be linearly independent with , so , contradicting maximality. Hence , and always, so and is a basis.
(a) implies (c). Let be a basis, so spans . Suppose some spanning satisfies , and pick . Then , so by monotonicity, and in particular . That makes linearly dependent, contradicting the assumption that is a basis. So is minimal among the spanning subsets.
(c) implies (a). Let be minimal among the spanning subsets of , so . If were linearly dependent, there would be with ; then is a linear subspace of containing and also containing , hence containing , hence containing by minimality of the span. So spans while , contradicting minimality of . Hence is linearly independent and is a basis.
Steps 1.1 and 1.2 give the equivalence of (a) and (b), and steps 1.3 and 1.4 give the equivalence of (a) and (c); so all three conditions are equivalent.
Remarks
-
Maximal and minimal, never greatest and least. There is in general no largest independent subset and no smallest spanning subset: a space usually has many bases, pairwise incomparable under inclusion, and Maximal element and greatest element is explicit that maximality does not imply greatestness. The companion page exhibits a three-element spanning set of containing three different bases.
-
This is the lemma that converts an existence problem into an order problem. Producing a basis becomes producing a maximal element of a poset, which is what Zorn's lemma does (Zorn's lemma); producing one inside a given spanning set becomes the same problem in a smaller poset. Both are carried out in Zorn's lemma gives a basis between any linearly independent set and any spanning set containing it: if with independent and , there is a basis of with , whose poset is the one named in (b) above, cut down to the subsets lying between a given independent set and a given spanning set.
-
The two orders are the same order on different families. Nothing above compares an independent set with a spanning set; the maximality of (b) is taken inside and the minimality of (c) inside , and a basis is exactly a set that is extreme in both families at once.
Depends on
- Basis of a vector space: a linearly independent spanning subset; and ordered basis: an injective finite list whose image is a basis
- Linear independence: a finite list $v : n \to V$ is independent when $\sum_{i<n} \lambda_i v_i = 0_V$ forces every $\lambda_i = 0_F$, and a subset $S \subseteq V$ is independent when every injective finite list into $S$ is independent
- Finite sums re-indexed along an injection, with a zero term deleted, and concatenated; and the closure properties of linear independence: an independent list is injective and never $0_V$, its sublists are independent, a list is independent exactly when it is injective with linearly independent image, and every subset of a linearly independent set is linearly independent
- If $S \subseteq V$ is linearly independent and $w \notin \operatorname{span}(S)$ then $S \cup \{w\}$ is linearly independent and $\operatorname{span}(S) \subsetneq \operatorname{span}(S \cup \{w\})$; and if $w \in \operatorname{span}(S)$ then $\operatorname{span}(S \cup \{w\}) = \operatorname{span}(S)$
- A subset $S \subseteq V$ is linearly dependent if and only if some $s \in S$ lies in $\operatorname{span}(S \setminus \{s\})$; and $\operatorname{span}(S)$ is already the set of linear combinations of INJECTIVE finite lists into $S$
- Linear combination of a finite list, and the span $\operatorname{span}(S)$ as the smallest linear subspace containing $S$
- The span is monotone and idempotent, $\operatorname{span}(S) = S$ exactly when $S$ is a linear subspace, and $\operatorname{span}(S \cup \{0_V\}) = \operatorname{span}(S)$
- Linear subspace of a vector space
- Partial order and partially ordered set
- Maximal element and greatest element
- Vector space over a field
- Field
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 59 results over 19 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Basis (linear algebra) (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- S. Axler, Linear Algebra Done Right, 4th ed., Ch. 2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Cambridge University Press excerpt: Vector spaces and bases (standard reference, not scraped)