Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Positive bias makes the Hermite feature kernel strictly positive definite on every sphere

Statement

Assume AC. Fix an integer n0≥1, a number β>0, and a globally Lipschitz function σ:R→R that is not a polynomial. Let Sn0−1={x∈Rn0:∥x∥2=1}, put q=n0−1+β2, and define μ(z)=σ(q z). Let am=∫μ(z)hm(z) dγ(z) be its coefficients in the normalized probabilists’ Hermite basis hm=Hm/m! of standard Gaussian measure γ. For x,y∈Sn0−1, let (Ux,y,Vx,y) be a centered Gaussian pair with variances q and covariance β2+x⋅y/n0, and set k(x,y)=E[σ(Ux,y)σ(Vx,y)]+β2. Then k is strictly positive definite on Sn0−1: for every finite list of pairwise distinct points x1,…,xN and every nonzero c∈RN, ∑i,j=1Ncicjk(xi,xj)>0. The conclusion includes n0=1, for which the sphere consists of the two points −1 and 1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; n0≥1; β>0; a globally Lipschitz nonpolynomial activation; and a finite set of distinct unit vectors.

[A1]

AC supplies the countable and dependent choice required by the Gaussian and Hermite suppliers (The Axiom of Choice, AC supplies countable selections and prescribed serial paths).

[F1]

The normalized probabilists’ Hermite polynomials are a complete orthonormal basis of L2(γ), Parseval gives ∑mam2=∥μ∥22, and every globally Lipschitz real function belongs to L2(γ) (Completeness of normalized probabilists’ Hermite polynomials in Gaussian L²).

[F2]

For a centered unit-variance Gaussian pair of correlation r∈[−1,1], the expectation of two L2(γ) functions with Hermite coefficients (am) and (bm) is ∑mambmrm, absolutely convergent at both endpoints (Hermite expansion of a correlated Gaussian feature kernel).

[F3]

Tonelli’s theorem permits interchange of sums of nonnegative terms (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product).

[F4]

The inner product on Rn0 is the Euclidean dot product; tensor powers use the induced coordinate inner product (Real and complex inner product spaces, with the inner product linear in the first argument).

Proof

technique · expand the Gaussian feature covariance, show every power coefficient is positive, then separate finitely many points by a polynomial
1.1A1F1F2givenalgebra

The marginal variance is q, and the standardized correlation is r(x,y)=β2+(x⋅y)/n0q=α(x⋅y)+δ,α=11+n0β2>0,δ=n0β21+n0β2>0,α+δ=1. The correlation lies in [−1,1] because ∣x⋅y∣≤1 and the displayed covariance is a valid two-dimensional Gram covariance of the input and bias features. Applying [F2] to μ gives k(x,y)=β2+∑r=0∞ar2(αx⋅y+δ)r. The series is absolutely convergent since ∣r(x,y)∣≤1 and ∑rar2<∞.

2.1F1F3step 1.1algebra

Expanding by the binomial theorem, for each x,y on the sphere the absolute double series is ∑r=0∞ar2∑m=0r(rm)αmδr−m∣x⋅y∣m=∑r=0∞ar2(α∣x⋅y∣+δ)r≤∑r=0∞ar2<∞, since ∣x⋅y∣≤1 and α+δ=1. Tonelli applied to this nonnegative absolute series justifies reordering the sign-changing binomial terms. Define dm=1{m=0}β2+αm∑r=m∞ar2(rm)δr−m(m≥0); then k(x,y)=∑m=0∞dm(x⋅y)m. Also, [F3] and α+δ=1 give ∑mdm=β2+∑rar2<∞.

3.1F1F3step 2.1given

The rescaled function μ(z)=σ(qz) is continuous and nonpolynomial: if it were a polynomial, then σ(u)=μ(u/q) would be a polynomial because q>0. It is globally Lipschitz, so [F1] supplies its L2(γ) membership and Parseval. The function μ has infinitely many nonzero Hermite coefficients: otherwise [F1] would make it equal almost everywhere to a polynomial, and continuity would make that equality hold everywhere, contradicting nonpolynomiality. Thus for each m there is an r≥m with ar≠0, and the corresponding term in [F3]’s sum is strictly positive because α,δ>0. Hence dm>0 for every m, including m=0 because β>0.

3.2F4step 2.1algebra

For any c∈RN, the quadratic form is ∑i,jcicjk(xi,xj)=∑m=0∞dm∥∑i=1Ncixi⊗m∥22≥0. Indeed, ⟨xi⊗m,xj⊗m⟩=(xi⋅xj)m by the induced tensor inner product, and the convergent series may be evaluated termwise because ∣xi⋅xj∣≤1 and ∑mdm<∞.

4.1F4step 3.2algebra∎

If this quadratic form were zero, positivity of every dm would force ∑icixi⊗m=0 for every m≥0. Consequently ∑icip(xi)=0 for every polynomial p on Rn0: each monomial of degree m is a coordinate linear functional on x⊗m, and constants correspond to m=0. For each index j, take pj(x)=∏i≠j∥x−xi∥22, with the empty product equal to 1. Then pj(xi)=0 for i≠j and pj(xj)>0, so cj=0. This holds for every j, contradicting c≠0. Thus the quadratic form in step 3.2 is strictly positive.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources