How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Block idempotents lift uniquely from kH to OH
Statement
Let be a splitting -modular system and let be finite. Reduction modulo the maximal ideal induces a bijection between the primitive central idempotents of and those of . Thus every block idempotent of has a unique central block lift in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The splitting system, its maximal ideal , and the finite group .
In a splitting -modular system, is a complete discrete valuation ring and (A splitting p-modular system for a finite group is a p-modular system whose fraction and residue fields split the needed group algebras).
Blocks are the primitive central idempotents of the relevant group algebra (p-blocks from primitive central idempotents).
Proof
Put . It is finite free over , hence complete and separated for the -adic topology by F1. Every element of lies in : if and , then , so has inverse . This is the Jacobson-radical test.
Let be idempotent and choose any lift . Inductively, if , apply the Newton correction Because commutes with , direct expansion shows that is a multiple of , while . Thus the errors tend to zero and is Cauchy. Completeness gives a limit with and reduction .
Suppose now that is central. For its reduction is , hence : the nontrivial inclusion uses that in the DVR, since . The finite -module has generators with . Multiplying by its adjugate shows that for every . The determinant is congruent to modulo , hence is a unit, so . Applying the same argument to gives that space zero too. Therefore for every , and is central.
If central idempotents have the same reduction, then . The commuting products and are idempotents in , and an idempotent in the Jacobson radical is zero. Hence . Thus every central idempotent of has exactly one central lift.
Central primitivity is preserved. If a central lift decomposed into two nonzero orthogonal central idempotents, neither summand could reduce to zero, since step 1.1 puts its kernel inside ; their reductions would decompose . Conversely, a central decomposition of lifts termwise by steps 2.1–3.1, and uniqueness in step 4.1 makes the lifted sum equal to . Hence is primitive exactly when is primitive. Together with F2 this proves the bijection and the asserted unique block lift, including the trivial-group case. The constructions are finite or sequential limits fixed by explicit formulas, so no choice principle is used.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Aschbacher–Kessar–Oliver, Fusion Systems in Algebra and Topology, Proposition 4.9 and preceding idempotent-lifting results, pp. 267–270 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Craven, The Brauer Correspondence, modular-system convention and Chapter 2 (standard reference, not scraped)