Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Block idempotents lift uniquely from kH to OH

Statement

Let (K,O,k) be a splitting p-modular system and let H be finite. Reduction modulo the maximal ideal m induces a bijection between the primitive central idempotents of OH and those of kH. Thus every block idempotent c of kH has a unique central block lift c^ in OH.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The splitting system, its maximal ideal m, and the finite group H.

[F1]

In a splitting p-modular system, O is a complete discrete valuation ring and k=O/m (A splitting p-modular system for a finite group is a p-modular system whose fraction and residue fields split the needed group algebras).

[F2]

Blocks are the primitive central idempotents of the relevant group algebra (p-blocks from primitive central idempotents).

Proof

1.1

Put A=OH. It is finite free over O, hence complete and separated for the m-adic topology by F1. Every element of mA lies in J(A): if xmA and yA, then (yx)n0, so 1yx has inverse n0(yx)n. This is the Jacobson-radical test.

F1algebra
2.1

Let eˉA/mA=kH be idempotent and choose any lift e1A. Inductively, if en2enmnA, apply the Newton correction en+1=en(2en1)(en2en). Because en commutes with en2en, direct expansion shows that en+12en+1 is a multiple of (en2en)2, while en+1enmnA. Thus the errors tend to zero and (en) is Cauchy. Completeness gives a limit e with e2=e and reduction eˉ.

F1step 1.1algebra
3.1

Suppose now that eˉ is central. For X=eA(1e) its reduction is eˉ(kH)(1eˉ)=0, hence X=mX: the nontrivial inclusion uses that m=(π) in the DVR, since x=πa=e(πa)(1e)=π(ea(1e)). The finite O-module X has generators x1,,xt with xi=πjaijxj. Multiplying (Iπ(aij))(xj)=0 by its adjugate shows that det(Iπ(aij))xj=0 for every j. The determinant is congruent to 1 modulo m, hence is a unit, so X=0. Applying the same argument to (1e)Ae gives that space zero too. Therefore ea=eae=ae for every aA, and e is central.

F1step 2.1algebra
4.1

If central idempotents e,fA have the same reduction, then efmAJ(A). The commuting products e(1f) and f(1e) are idempotents in J(A), and an idempotent in the Jacobson radical is zero. Hence e=ef=f. Thus every central idempotent of kH has exactly one central lift.

step 1.1step 3.1algebra
5.1

Central primitivity is preserved. If a central lift e decomposed into two nonzero orthogonal central idempotents, neither summand could reduce to zero, since step 1.1 puts its kernel inside J(A); their reductions would decompose eˉ. Conversely, a central decomposition of eˉ lifts termwise by steps 2.1–3.1, and uniqueness in step 4.1 makes the lifted sum equal to e. Hence e is primitive exactly when eˉ is primitive. Together with F2 this proves the bijection and the asserted unique block lift, including the trivial-group case. The constructions are finite or sequential limits fixed by explicit formulas, so no choice principle is used.

F2step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources