How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite source normal form over the Dubrovnik coefficient extension
Statement
Let and . Put and . For every , the abstract presented algebra has a finite basis indexed by the perfect matchings of endpoints. In particular it is spanned by elements, where and for . This is a source-module assertion about the generators-and-relations algebra, independently of any proposed map to a Dubrovnik tangle algebra.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The abstract BMW presentation over and the finite matching index set.
Over , the abstract BMW presentation has a matching-indexed basis. Its local proof establishes tower absorption, nested-cap identities, the through-strand ideal filtration, and shuffle stability before the double-induction injectivity argument (BMW basis by descending Kauffman tangles, Proof phases 6–18).
The BMW presentation uses , , , and , with the displayed braid and cup-slide relations; ranks zero and one are the scalar algebra (BMW algebra in a fixed Kauffman skein convention).
In , , , , and (BMW relations in the Dubrovnik parameter convention).
Proof
Define by , , . Its defining relation maps to zero by [F3], and its unit generators map to units. Conversely define by , , , and . The relation of maps to the relation of , and maps to zero. On each displayed ring generator, both composites are the identity. Thus are inverse ring isomorphisms, without inverting or requiring a flatness argument.
Transport the source presentation along . Send each and to the identically named generator over . The braid, commutation and cup-slide relations are literally identical, while the remaining coefficients become , , , and , exactly as in [F2] and [F3]. The inverse coefficient map gives an inverse map of presented algebras, because it fixes the generator names and reverses each coefficient substitution. This verifies the source comparison without assuming that either tangle realization is injective.
Transport the basis in [F1] through this algebra isomorphism. If denotes the transported basis element with matching index , every source element has one expression with , and these expressions are unique. This is the finite source normal form supplied by the already proved local universal theorem, whose ideal/shuffle proof concerns the abstract algebra rather than a dimension inference from a tangle quotient. A perfect matching pairs the first endpoint in ways and then matches the remaining endpoints; hence there are indices, and one empty index at . The scalar definitions give the same rank-one conclusion at .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Goodman and Hauschild, Affine Birman–Wenzl–Murakami Algebras and Tangles in the Solid Torus, §§5.4–5.5 (standard reference, not scraped)