Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Small sets of ground ordinals are captured at a bounded iteration stage

Statement

In ZFC, let δ have uncountable cofinality and Pδ be a finite-support ccc iteration. In a Pδ-extension, every set A of ground-model ordinals with A<cf(δ) belongs to some V[Gα], α<δ. The same holds for structures and indexed families coded by such sets.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the iteration and the stated small set in the final extension.

[F1]

Forcing theorem supplies the truth lemma, and Monotonicity, density, and decision for forcing supplies dense decisions; ccc makes maximal deciding antichains countable.

[F3]

Restriction maps and complete embeddings in an iteration supplies complete top-padding embeddings and generic restrictions. It does not identify arbitrary finite-support conditions with literal top-paddings; the normalization and bounded intermediate name are constructed below.

Proof

1.1

Work in the given extension V[G]. By F2 choose a ground cardinal ν<cf(δ) equal to A there, and choose in V[G] a surjection f:νA. The truth lemma gives a ground Pδ-name f˙ and pG forcing that f˙:νˇOrd and is onto a name A˙ for A. Thus the antichains below are indexed by the ground ordinal ν, not by the extension set A. For every ξ<ν, choose in the ground model a maximal antichain below p deciding f˙(ξˇ) as some check ordinal. Each antichain is countable by ccc. There are fewer than cf(δ) antichains, and every condition has finite support, so the union S of all their supports, together with supp(p), has size below cf(δ). AC supplies the simultaneous antichains and code.

F1F2
2.1

By regularity of cf(δ), S is bounded by some α<δ. Normalize p and every member a of every chosen antichain: replace each coordinate outside its finite support by the distinguished literal top name. At such a coordinate the original prefix forces equality to top, so induction on coordinates makes the normalized condition forcing-equivalent to the original in both order directions and preserves every decision. The normalized support is still contained in α; hence these conditions, unlike the raw ones, are literal top-paddings of their Pα restrictions. Replace each antichain by its normalized image, removing duplicates if needed. Equivalence preserves antichain maximality below normalized p and the ordinal labels.

F3step 1.1
3.1

Each normalized antichain is predense below normalized pα in Pα: a Pα-extension of that prefix has a top-padding below normalized p; maximality supplies a compatible normalized antichain member, and F3 reflects compatibility between these padded conditions. For each ξ<ν, label the resulting Pα-antichain by the ground ordinal it forces for f˙(ξˇ). These labelled antichains define an explicit Pα-name f˙α; this construction does not restrict the original Pδ-name f˙. Since normalized p is equivalent to pG, it belongs to G, and Gα meets each predense antichain below its prefix. The corresponding padded antichain member lies in G and forces the same value of f˙(ξˇ), so f˙α,Gα=fG. Thus its range A lies in V[Gα]. F2 ensures that “fewer than cf(δ)” has not changed.

F2F3step 1.1step 2.1
4.1

A structure or indexed family coded by a small set of ground ordinals is recovered by fixed decoding operations from that set, so it belongs to the same intermediate model. The coding qualification is essential: no assertion is made for arbitrary unbounded collections lacking such a code.

step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources