How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Small sets of ground ordinals are captured at a bounded iteration stage
Statement
In ZFC, let have uncountable cofinality and be a finite-support ccc iteration. In a -extension, every set of ground-model ordinals with belongs to some , . The same holds for structures and indexed families coded by such sets.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, the iteration and the stated small set in the final extension.
Forcing theorem supplies the truth lemma, and Monotonicity, density, and decision for forcing supplies dense decisions; ccc makes maximal deciding antichains countable.
Restriction maps and complete embeddings in an iteration supplies complete top-padding embeddings and generic restrictions. It does not identify arbitrary finite-support conditions with literal top-paddings; the normalization and bounded intermediate name are constructed below.
Proof
Work in the given extension . By F2 choose a ground cardinal equal to there, and choose in a surjection . The truth lemma gives a ground -name and forcing that and is onto a name for . Thus the antichains below are indexed by the ground ordinal , not by the extension set . For every , choose in the ground model a maximal antichain below deciding as some check ordinal. Each antichain is countable by ccc. There are fewer than antichains, and every condition has finite support, so the union of all their supports, together with , has size below . AC supplies the simultaneous antichains and code.
By regularity of , is bounded by some . Normalize and every member of every chosen antichain: replace each coordinate outside its finite support by the distinguished literal top name. At such a coordinate the original prefix forces equality to top, so induction on coordinates makes the normalized condition forcing-equivalent to the original in both order directions and preserves every decision. The normalized support is still contained in ; hence these conditions, unlike the raw ones, are literal top-paddings of their restrictions. Replace each antichain by its normalized image, removing duplicates if needed. Equivalence preserves antichain maximality below normalized and the ordinal labels.
Each normalized antichain is predense below normalized in : a -extension of that prefix has a top-padding below normalized ; maximality supplies a compatible normalized antichain member, and F3 reflects compatibility between these padded conditions. For each , label the resulting -antichain by the ground ordinal it forces for . These labelled antichains define an explicit -name ; this construction does not restrict the original -name . Since normalized is equivalent to , it belongs to , and meets each predense antichain below its prefix. The corresponding padded antichain member lies in and forces the same value of , so . Thus its range lies in . F2 ensures that “fewer than ” has not changed.
A structure or indexed family coded by a small set of ground ordinals is recovered by fixed decoding operations from that set, so it belongs to the same intermediate model. The coding qualification is essential: no assertion is made for arbitrary unbounded collections lacking such a code.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Karagila, Forcing & Symmetric Extensions, bounded-name argument in Theorem 7.10 (standard reference, not scraped)