How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The canonical comparison to the tensor functor of is balanced and natural
Statement
Let be unital rings, let be additive, and let carry the -bimodule structure of is a -bimodule for every additive functor . For let , . Then
is balanced (Balanced maps from a right module and a left module, and bilinear maps over a commutative ring) and -linear in , so it induces a unique group homomorphism
and each is -linear. Moreover is natural: for every left -linear (Natural transformation and its components). The construction of chooses no presentation of and no elements.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Unital rings , , an additive functor , the -bimodule with for , a left -module , and , , , .
Left -modules satisfy the module axioms, and right multiplication is an endomorphism of the left -module (Unital left and right modules over a ring; unqualified module means left module).
The formula makes a -bimodule, so the right -action and the left -action are defined and commute: ( is a -bimodule for every additive functor ).
A balanced map into an abelian group is additive in each variable and satisfies (Balanced maps from a right module and a left module, and bilinear maps over a commutative ring).
Every balanced map into an abelian group factors uniquely as through the universal balanced map (Universal property of the tensor product for balanced maps into abelian groups).
If is a -bimodule, then carries a left -module structure with (A commuting outer scalar action descends to a tensor product).
A natural transformation is a family of components satisfying for every (Natural transformation and its components).
Module maps induce tensor maps with , functorially (Module homomorphisms induce tensor-product homomorphisms functorially).
Proof
For each the map , , is left -linear, since and ; moreover and , because .
The pairing is well defined because is a -module homomorphism; it is additive in and -linear in because is, and additive in because by additivity of and step 1.1. It is balanced: by step 1.1, [F2] and functoriality.
By [F4] the balanced pairing induces a unique group homomorphism with . It is -linear: by [F5] the left -action on satisfies , and , because is -linear and elementary tensors generate; both sides are additive in the tensor variable, so equality on elementary tensors suffices.
Naturality: for left -linear one has , since , hence by functoriality. Evaluating at and using gives ; both sides are additive in the tensor variable and agree on elementary tensors, so .
Steps 3.1 and 4.1 show that the components are -linear maps assembling into a natural transformation with ; the formulas used only the given element and the module , never a presentation of , and no element of an auxiliary set is selected, so no presentation and no choice are involved.
Depends on
- $F(A)$ is a $(B,A)$-bimodule for every additive functor $F$
- Universal property of the tensor product for balanced maps into abelian groups
- A commuting outer scalar action descends to a tensor product
- Natural transformation and its components
- Balanced maps from a right module and a left module, and bilinear maps over a commutative ring
- Unital left and right modules over a ring; unqualified module means left module
- Module homomorphisms induce tensor-product homomorphisms functorially
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- M. Kamensky, Non-Commutative Algebra (BGU course notes, Spring 2017), §5.1, Theorem 5.1.43, Proposition 5.1.40, Lemma 5.1.46, Corollaries 5.1.48-5.1.49 (standard reference, not scraped)
- A. Nyman and S. P. Smith, A Generalization of Watts's Theorem: Right Exact Functors on Module Categories, arXiv:0806.0832, Theorem 1.1-1.2, Propositions 3.2-3.3, Lemma 3.4 (standard reference, not scraped)