Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Chart independence of Cr smoothness

Statement

Let M and N be smooth manifolds, let F:MN be continuous at pM, and let rN0{}. Let (U,φ), (U,φ) be smooth charts of M at p and (V,ψ), (V,ψ) smooth charts of N at F(p), with F(U)V and F(U)V. If the representative ψFφ1 is of class Cr on a neighbourhood of φ(p), then the representative ψFφ1 is of class Cr on a neighbourhood of φ(p). Testing one chart pair therefore agrees with testing any other.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The manifolds, map, point, smoothness class r, and the four charts of the Statement, with ψFφ1 of class Cr near φ(p).

[F1]

Any two charts of a smooth manifold are smoothly compatible: their domains are disjoint or both transition maps are smooth (Smoothly compatible charts and the smoothness of Euclidean transition maps, Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts).

[L1]

If u:WW is smooth and g:WW is Cr, then gu is Cr; and if h:WW is Cr and v:WW is smooth, then vh is Cr (Compatibility of smooth atlases is an equivalence relation, and smooth Euclidean maps compose).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The overlaps UU and VV contain p and F(p), so both are [given, F1] nonempty; by [F1] the transitions φφ1 on φ(UU) and ψψ1 on ψ(VV) are smooth. Because F is continuous at p and F(p)VV, there is an open neighbourhood UpUU of p with F(Up)VV.

givenF1
2.1

On φ(Up) the new representative factors as

givenF1L1step 1.1

ψFφ1=(ψψ1)(ψFφ1)(φφ1).

First [L1] composes the smooth φφ1 after the Cr map ψFφ1 and keeps Cr; then [L1] composes the smooth ψψ1 after that and keeps Cr. The middle factor is Cr on the image of φ(Up) under φφ1, which is an open neighbourhood of φ(p) inside the set where the given representative is Cr; hence the composite is Cr on φ(Up). [given, F1, L1, step 1.1]

3.1

The set φ(Up) is an open neighbourhood of φ(p), so the [given, step 2.1] representative ψFφ1 is Cr near φ(p). The reverse implication is the same argument with the chart pairs interchanged.

givenstep 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Cʳ and smooth maps between smooth manifolds.

Dependency tree · two levels

17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources