Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Compact convolution operators commute with right translations and have conjugate-kernel adjoints

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let K be a compact Hausdorff group with normalized Haar probability μ, let φ∈L2(K,μ;C) and let Cφ be left convolution by φ on L2(K), (Cφh)(x)=∫Kφ(xy−1)h(y) dμ(y) (L² convolution on a compact group is Hilbert–Schmidt).

  1. For every g∈K, Cφρ(g)=ρ(g)Cφ, where ρ(g)h(x)=h(xg) is the right regular unitary representation (Left and right regular unitary representations of an LCH group); here ΔK≡1 because compact groups are unimodular (Compact, discrete and abelian groups are unimodular).
  2. With φ∗(k):=φ(k−1)‾ one has Cφ∗=Cφ∗; hence if φ∗=φ almost everywhere then Cφ is self-adjoint. Moreover, when φ=φ∗, every eigenspace ker⁡(Cφ−λI) for λ∈C (the case λ=0 being the kernel ker⁡Cφ) is ρ(K)-invariant.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Under AC the compact group K carries a normalized Haar probability μ, and this measure is left invariant, right invariant and inversion invariant. (Normalized Haar probability on a compact group)

[F2]

Integrals of integrable complex functions are invariant under measure-preserving maps. (Integral invariance under measure-preserving maps)

[F3]

Compact groups are unimodular, so ΔK≡1, and the right regular representation is ρ(g)h(x)=h(xg) on L2(K). (Compact, discrete and abelian groups are unimodular, Left and right regular unitary representations of an LCH group)

[F4]

Under AC the operator Cφ is a well-defined bounded linear operator on L2(K), independent of the chosen representative of φ, and it is Hilbert–Schmidt with ∥Cφ∥HS=∥φ∥2. (L² convolution on a compact group is Hilbert–Schmidt)

[F6]

On the product of sigma-finite measure spaces, a product-measurable L1 function has equal iterated integrals and its value is the product integral. (Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product)

[F7]

The inner product on L2(K) is ⟨h1,h2⟩=∫Kh1h2‾ dμ. (Complex Haar L^p spaces and compactly supported functions)

[F8]

The Hilbert adjoint of a bounded operator is the unique bounded operator satisfying ⟨Tx,y⟩=⟨x,T∗y⟩ for all x,y. (The Hilbert-space adjoint of a bounded operator, Hilbert-adjoint identities)

Proof

Given: AC, a compact Hausdorff group K with normalized Haar probability μ, a class φ∈L2(K), the operator Cφ, the right regular representation ρ, and φ∗(k)=φ(k−1)‾.

1.1F1F2F3F4F5

Fix g∈K and h∈L2(K); for every x the function y↦φ(xy−1)h(yg) is integrable by Cauchy–Schwarz and Haar invariance, and the substitution y′=yg together with right invariance of μ and the identity x(y′g−1)−1=xgy′−1 gives (Cφρ(g)h)(x)=∫Kφ(xy−1)h(yg) dμ(y)=∫Kφ(xgy′−1)h(y′) dμ(y′)=(ρ(g)Cφh)(x) for almost every x∈K, whence Cφρ(g)=ρ(g)Cφ in L2(K); this is (1).

1.2F1F2F4F6F7

First suppose φ∈C(K). Its kernel (x,y)↦φ(xy−1) is product-measurable by the finite-rectangle product-measurability argument in L² convolution on a compact group is Hilbert–Schmidt. For h1,h2∈L2(K) the function (x,y)↦φ(xy−1)h1(y)h2(x)‾ lies in L1(K×K) because its absolute integral is at most ∥φ∥2∥h1∥2∥h2∥2 and μ is a probability, so Fubini and the definition of Cφ give ⟨Cφh1,h2⟩=∫K∫Kφ(xy−1)h1(y)h2(x)‾ dμ(y) dμ(x).

2.1F4F6F7step 1.2

By definition of φ∗ one has φ∗(yx−1)‾=φ(xy−1) for all x,y∈K, so expanding the definition of Cφ∗ in the second slot and applying Fubini to the same L1 function as in step 1.2 gives ⟨h1,Cφ∗h2⟩=∫K∫Kh1(y)φ∗(yx−1)‾h2(x)‾ dμ(x) dμ(y)=∫K∫Kφ(xy−1)h1(y)h2(x)‾ dμ(y) dμ(x)=⟨Cφh1,h2⟩ for all h1,h2∈L2(K).

3.1F4F8step 2.1

For continuous φ, the identity of step 2.1 exhibits Cφ∗ as an adjoint of the bounded operator Cφ, so Cφ∗=Cφ∗ by uniqueness of the Hilbert adjoint. For general φ∈L2(K) choose φn∈C(K) converging in L2 to φ, as in the convolution supplier [F4]. Haar inversion gives ∥φn∗−φ∗∥2=∥φn−φ∥2, and Cauchy–Schwarz gives ∥Ca∥≤∥a∥2. Hence Cφn→Cφ and Cφn∗→Cφ∗ in operator norm; the adjoint norm identity in [F8] passes Cφn∗=Cφn∗ to the limit. Thus Cφ∗=Cφ∗ for every L2 kernel. If φ∗=φ almost everywhere, independence of the representative gives Cφ∗=Cφ, and Cφ is self-adjoint.

4.1step 1.1algebra∎

Let z∈ker⁡(Cφ−λI) for some λ∈C and let g∈K; by (1) the operators Cφ and ρ(g) commute, hence Cφ(ρ(g)z)=ρ(g)Cφz=λ ρ(g)z, so ρ(g)z lies in the same eigenspace, and applying this to g−1 gives ρ(g)ker⁡(Cφ−λI)=ker⁡(Cφ−λI); the case λ=0 is the kernel ker⁡Cφ. The Axiom of Choice is consumed through the normalized Haar probability and the cited Hilbert-space and adjoint suppliers; the computations above are choice-free apart from those inputs.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

60 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources