How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
On a discrete domain the compact-open topology is the topology of pointwise convergence
Statement
Let be a discrete topological space (The discrete, indiscrete, cofinite, cocountable, particular-point and Sierpinski topologies) and a topological space. Every compact subset of is finite (Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right), and on the compact-open topology (The compact-open topology on for arbitrary topological spaces) coincides with the topology of pointwise convergence (The topology of pointwise convergence on , which is the product topology, and its restriction to ); hence on every the compact-open subspace topology is the subspace topology inherited from the product . In particular finite intersections of sets , with and open, form a basis; these are open-coordinate constraints, not requirements that a coordinate equal a prescribed value.
Facts & Assumptions
In the discrete topology on every subset is open, and a subset is compact exactly when every open cover of by open sets of (equivalently of the subspace ) has a finite subcover; the empty space and every finite space are compact. (The discrete, indiscrete, cofinite, cocountable, particular-point and Sierpinski topologies, Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right, A subspace is compact exactly when every family of open subsets of the ambient space covering it, indexed or not, has finitely many members covering it)
The compact-open topology on is generated by the subbasis of sets with compact and open. (The compact-open topology on for arbitrary topological spaces)
The topology of pointwise convergence on is the subspace topology inherited from the product ; its subbasis consists of the traces of the sets , , open, and its basic open sets impose open-set constraints at finitely many points of . (The topology of pointwise convergence on , which is the product topology, and its restriction to , Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace)
In the product topology on the basic open sets are the boxes that restrict only finitely many coordinates. (The product set of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space)
Proof
Given: A discrete space , a topological space , and the two topologies on .
Every compact subset is finite: the family of singleton subsets , , is an open cover of the subspace by [F1]. Compactness of gives a finite subcover, exhibiting as the union of finitely many singletons; for , the empty family suffices.
For every finite and every open the subbasic compact-open set is the finite intersection .
Each compact-open subbasic set is a finite intersection of pointwise subbasic sets by steps 1.1 and 1.2, and each pointwise subbasic set equals , which is compact-open subbasic because the singleton is compact by [F1]. A topology containing a family contains the topology generated by it, so the two topologies on each contain the other, hence are equal; by [F3] this common topology is the subspace topology inherited from .
Restricting an equality of topologies to a subset preserves it: for the traces on of the two topologies coincide. The pointwise topology is the subspace topology from by [F3], and its basic open sets impose open-set constraints on finitely many coordinates by [F3, F4]; hence on , and on every , those sets form a basis.
Depends on
- The compact-open topology on $C(X,Y)$ for arbitrary topological spaces
- The topology of pointwise convergence on $Y^{X}$, which is the product topology, and its restriction to $C(X,Y)$
- The product set $\prod_{i \in I} X_i$ of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space
- The discrete, indiscrete, cofinite, cocountable, particular-point and Sierpinski topologies
- Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right
- A subspace is compact exactly when every family of open subsets of the ambient space covering it, indexed or not, has finitely many members covering it
- Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace
Used by
- The Pontryagin dual of a finite cyclic group Example
- The Pontryagin dual of ℤ is the circle Example
- Duals of finite products and of discrete direct sums Lemma
- Pointwise limits of homomorphisms and of equicontinuous characters Lemma
- Compact groups have discrete duals and discrete groups have compact duals Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Dikran D. Dikranjan, Introduction to Topological Groups (author lecture notes, Universita di Udine / Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 2007) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Manfred Einsiedler and Thomas Ward, Ergodic Theory with a View Towards Number Theory, Appendix C (course-hosted full text) (standard reference, not scraped)