Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Fourth-moment bound for a centered complex quadratic form

Statement

Let ξ=(ξ1,…,ξd)T have independent identically distributed complex coordinates with Eξi=0, E∣ξi∣2=1, and μ4:=E∣ξi∣4<∞. Let A be an independent random complex d×d matrix with E∥A∥F2<∞, where ∥A∥F2:=∑i,j∣Aij∣2. Put τ:=Eξ12. Then E∣ξ∗Aξ−tr⁡A∣2≤Cμ4,τ E∥A∥F2,Cμ4,τ:=max⁡{μ4−1,1+∣τ∣2}.

Statement references

Bai, Miao, and Pan, Lemma 1 in §2, printed p. 12 (full paper PDF).

Bai and Silverstein, Chapter 3, §3.3, printed pp. 57–58 (full book PDF).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The independent vector and matrix, moment conditions, and Frobenius norm in the Statement.

[F1]

IID means the coordinates are mutually independent and have one common law (Identical distribution and IID families).

[F2]

The joint law of independent random elements is the product of their marginal laws (Independent random elements have product joint law).

[F3]

Fubini's theorem permits integration in either order for an integrable function on a sigma-finite product space (Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product).

Proof

Given: The moment hypotheses, independence, and finite Frobenius-norm second moment in the Statement.

1.1givenF1algebra

First fix a deterministic complex matrix A. Centering the diagonal terms gives ξ∗Aξ−tr⁡A=∑iAii(∣ξi∣2−1)+∑i≠jξi‾Aijξj. In the squared modulus, independence and Eξi=0 make diagonal and off-diagonal parts uncorrelated; distinct diagonal terms are uncorrelated; and two off-diagonal terms have nonzero expectation only when their ordered index pairs agree or are reversed. Expanding those remaining terms yields E∣ξ∗Aξ−tr⁡A∣2=(μ4−1)∑i∣Aii∣2+∑i≠j∣Aij∣2+∣τ∣2∑i≠jAijAji‾. Here μ4−1≥0 by Cauchy–Schwarz, and ∣τ∣≤E∣ξ1∣2=1. Also ∣∑i≠jAijAji‾∣≤∑i≠j∣Aij∣∣Aji∣≤∑i≠j∣Aij∣2. Thus the deterministic quadratic-form variance is at most Cμ4,τ∥A∥F2.

2.1givenF2F3step 1.1algebra∎

By [F2], (ξ,A) has product joint law. The integrand is integrable because ∣ξ∗Aξ−tr⁡A∣2≤2∥A∥F2∥ξ∥24+2d∥A∥F2, and E∥ξ∥24<∞ in finite dimension. Integrate the deterministic inequality from step 1.1 over the law of A; [F3] justifies the order of integration and gives the stated bound.

Source notes

Bai, Miao, and Pan, Lemma 1 in §2, printed p. 12 (full paper PDF).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources