Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Computed sensitivity errors perturb every singular value by at most their operator-norm error

Statement

Let J,Jh∈Rm×n, let r=min⁡{m,n}, and let σ1(A)≥⋯≥σr(A)≥0 denote the singular values of a real matrix A. Then for every 1≤i≤r, ∣σi(Jh)−σi(J)∣≤∥Jh−J∥2, where ∥⋅∥2 is the Euclidean operator norm.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Real matrices J,Jh∈Rm×n and an index 1≤i≤r=min⁡{m,n}.

[F1]

The best rank-at-most-k approximation in operator norm is the rank-k truncation of a singular value decomposition: the best operator-norm error among matrices of rank at most i−1 is σi(A), attained by an SVD truncation, for both A=J and A=Jh.

[F2]

The operator norm is zero on the zero domain and otherwise is max_{||v||=1} ||Tv||: ∥A∥2=max⁡∥v∥2=1∥Av∥2 for a nonzero domain, and the Euclidean vector norm satisfies the triangle inequality (The norm ∥v∥=⟨v,v⟩ induced by a real or complex inner product).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2givenchoosealgebra

Let Ji−1 be the rank-at-most-(i−1) SVD truncation of J. By [F1], ∥J−Ji−1∥2=σi(J), while the minimal-error characterization in [F1] for Jh gives σi(Jh)≤∥Jh−Ji−1∥2. For every unit vector v, the vector triangle inequality gives ∥(Jh−Ji−1)v∥2≤∥(J−Ji−1)v∥2+∥(Jh−J)v∥2≤∥J−Ji−1∥2+∥Jh−J∥2; taking the maximum over unit v proves σi(Jh)≤σi(J)+∥Jh−J∥2.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

Apply step 1.1 with Jh in place of J and J−Jh in place of Jh−J. This gives σi(J)≤σi(Jh)+∥J−Jh∥2. The two one-sided inequalities imply the asserted absolute-value bound.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources