Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-28
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The best rank-at-most-k approximation in operator norm is the rank-k truncation of a singular value decomposition

Statement

Let T:VW be a linear map between finite-dimensional real or complex inner product spaces, let

Tv=j=1rsjv,ejfj

be a singular value decomposition with s1sr>0, and fix an integer k with 0k<dimV. Define

Tkv:=j=1min(k,r)sjv,ejfj.

Then rankTkk, one has

TTk=sk+1

with the convention sk+1=0 when kr, and every linear map A:VW with rankAk satisfies

TAsk+1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A linear map T:VW between finite-dimensional real or complex inner product spaces and the rank-k truncation Tk above.

[L3]

Rank-nullity holds for linear maps with finite-dimensional domain (Rank-nullity: dimFV=nullityT+rankT).

[L4]

A linear subspace of a finite-dimensional vector space cannot have larger dimension than the ambient space (If dimFV=n and U is a linear subspace of V, then U is finite-dimensional, dimFUn, and dimFU=n if and only if U=V).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The image of Tk is contained in span(f1,,fk), so rankTkk. When k=0, the defining sum for Tk is empty and Tk=0; in general (TTk)v=j>ksjv,ejfj, which is again an SVD, so [L2] gives TTk=sk+1, with value 0 when kr.

L1L2algebra
1.2

Let A:VW have rank at most k, and put E:=span(e1,,ek+1). If AE were injective, then [L3] applied to AE:EW would force dimim(AE)=k+1, but im(AE)imA and [L4] gives dimimAk, contradiction. Hence some unit vector vE satisfies Av=0.

L3L4algebra
2.1

Write that unit vector as v=j=1k+1cjej. Then Tv2=j=1k+1sj2cj2sk+12j=1k+1cj2=sk+12. Because Av=0, one has TA(TA)v=Tvsk+1. Combined with step 1.1, this proves that Tk is a best rank-at-most-k approximation in operator norm.

step 1.2algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources