How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
In the spectral norm, numerical rank counts the singular values above the declared threshold
Statement
Let with and , let with singular values , let , and let be the spectral norm. Then
where is the numerical rank of Numerical rank relative to a declared norm, scale, and tolerance. Consequently, if two tolerances have a singular value with , then : moving the threshold past a singular value changes the numerical rank.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Natural numbers , a matrix with singular values , and a tolerance .
Numerical rank: (Numerical rank relative to a declared norm, scale, and tolerance).
Eckart–Young: for , the least spectral-norm distance from to the matrices of rank at most is , with the convention when exceeds the number of positive singular values (The best rank-at-most-k approximation in operator norm is the rank-k truncation of a singular value decomposition).
The rank of a matrix is the number of its positive singular values (The rank of a linear map is the number of its nonzero singular values).
Proof
For the matrix itself has rank at most by [L3], so the distance to rank at most is ; with the convention of [L2] this agrees with . For , [L2] gives the distance . Hence for every , .
Let . If then while ; if then all singular values exceed and . In both cases , because every has .
By step 1.1, there exists a matrix with and exactly when . Therefore [L1] gives .
Steps 2.1 and 1.2 give , which is the displayed formula.
If then is counted at tolerance but not at tolerance , and no larger index is counted at ; hence , the stated consequence.
Step 3.1 proves the formula and step 4.1 the consequence.
Depends on
- Numerical rank relative to a declared norm, scale, and tolerance
- The best rank-at-most-k approximation in operator norm is the rank-k truncation of a singular value decomposition
- The rank of a linear map is the number of its nonzero singular values
- The operator norm is 0 on the zero domain and otherwise equals the largest singular value, attained at a right-singular vector
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- David Bindel, CS 6210: Matrix Nearness Problems (standard reference, not scraped)