How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The continuation energy identity
Statement
Assume (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()) for the smooth-bundle setup. Let be a continuation datum from to on a closed manifold , and let be a solution of the continuation equation with limits , (A regular continuation datum between Morse--Smale pairs, Continuation solutions have critical limits and exponential decay). Write and . Then Since on and is integrable by smoothness and compact support, in particular For a constant datum (, for all ) the identity reduces to the classical energy identity of A negative-gradient trajectory satisfies the energy identity.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , a closed manifold , a continuation datum with threshold , and a solution of the continuation equation with limits .
The datum is constant on the two half-lines: for and for (A regular continuation datum between Morse--Smale pairs).
The gradient is characterized by for every , so along a solution (The Riemannian gradient is the metric dual of the differential).
The stated limits and continuity give and . The function is smooth and supported in , hence integrable. These facts use the given limits, not a choice-dependent existence or exponential-decay theorem.
Along an autonomous negative-gradient curve, (A negative-gradient trajectory satisfies the energy identity). Integrating on finite intervals and taking the given limits yields , including constant curves.
Proof
The curve is smooth, and differentiating it gives , the two terms being the derivatives through the second argument and through the explicit -dependence of .
Substituting the continuation equation into [F2] gives ; combining with step 1.1 yields .
Integrate step 2.1 over and apply the fundamental theorem of calculus: .
By [F3] the endpoints converge, and , while the integral of is already constant for . The identity of step 3.1 therefore makes the nonnegative integrals converge to a finite limit as ; by the definition of the improper integral, this gives .
By [F1] the integrand vanishes off , so its integral is bounded by , and by definition; this gives the displayed two-sided bound. For a constant datum and step 4.1 becomes exactly [F4].
Depends on
- A regular continuation datum between Morse--Smale pairs
- Continuation solutions have critical limits and exponential decay
- The Riemannian gradient is the metric dual of the differential
- A negative-gradient trajectory satisfies the energy identity
- Morse--Smale pairs
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Alexander F. Ritter, Part III Morse Homology (Cambridge lecture notes, complete author PDF, 115 pp.) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Liviu I. Nicolaescu, An Invitation to Morse Theory, 2nd ed. (complete author PDF, 291 pp.) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Michele Audin and Mihai Damian, Morse Theory and Floer Homology (complete author PDF of the English book, 628 pp.) (standard reference, not scraped)