How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The bounded-kernel continuous coagulation-fragmentation field is locally Lipschitz
Statement
Let be the vector field from Continuous-size coagulation-fragmentation weak model. On the ball it satisfies
Also, .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The symmetric bilinear coagulation operator and linear fragmentation operator on .
Proof
Bilinearity and symmetry give . Applying [F1] to each term and the ball bounds yields at most .
Linearity and [F2] bound the fragmentation difference by . Adding the coagulation and fragmentation estimates proves the stated Lipschitz bound. Both operators vanish at the zero measure, so .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Philippe Laurençot, Weak compactness techniques and coagulation equations, §§3.1–3.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Philippe Laurençot and Stéphane Mischler, From the discrete to the continuous coagulation-fragmentation equations, §§1–2 (standard reference, not scraped)