How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A continuum-sized almost-disjoint family on omega
Statement
In ZFC there is an almost-disjoint family of infinite subsets of of cardinality .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC for the ambient cardinal comparison.
Proof
Fix an explicit bijection . For each branch , put . This set is infinite because distinct lengths give distinct nodes.
If , let be their first differing coordinate. Then for every , so is contained in the finite set of codes of their common initial segments. Also would force equality of every initial segment, so is injective. The family therefore has size . The construction makes no arbitrary choice after is fixed.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Karagila, Forcing & Symmetric Extensions, proof of Theorem 7.7 (standard reference, not scraped)