Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Coordinate-ball classes identify local homology stalks

Statement

Let M be a boundaryless n-manifold, and let a chart contain concentric coordinate balls K=B(0,r)B(0,s), where 0<r<s. We identify these sets with their preimages in M. For every xintK and commutative unital ring R, the map of pairs induces an isomorphism Hn(M,MK;R)Hn(M,M{x};R). If a closed coordinate ball J in any chart lies inside intK, restriction from K to J is also an isomorphism and commutes with point restrictions over intJ. In dimension zero use singleton chart balls. No AC is needed.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Local homology detects manifold dimension, interior, and boundary computes the local group at an interior point as R in degree n, and gives the point-complex and radial-contraction calculations.

[F2]

Excision for singular homology identifies local pairs after removing a closed subset lying in the open complement of the support.

[F3]

Long exact sequence of a pair gives pair connecting maps. Relative connecting homomorphism on cycles identifies their representatives as boundaries of relative cycles, and The long exact homology sequence is natural makes the connecting squares commute for maps of pairs.

[F4]

Homotopic maps induce the same map on singular homology applies to the explicit radial and translation homotopies below.

[F5]

Functoriality of relative homology supplies identity and composition laws for restriction maps.

Proof

Given: The stated chart, radii, point and coefficient ring. First let n1 and set B=B(0,s).

1.1

The ball K is compact by [F6]; compactness of its chart preimage follows by pulling any open cover back to the Euclidean ball and taking a finite subcover there. It is closed in Hausdorff M. Thus Z=MB is closed and contained in the open set MK. Excision gives Hn(M,MK;R)Hn(B,BK;R). It gives the analogous isomorphism for {x}, and these identifications commute with the restriction maps since all are induced by inclusions.

F2F5F6given
1.2

Put ρ=(r+s)/2. The annulus BK retracts onto Sρ={u:u=ρ} by u(1t+tρ/u)u: throughout the homotopy its norm is strictly between r and s. The inclusion SρRn{x} is a homotopy equivalence on homology. Indeed translate the target by x; the resulting map uux is homotopic to uu by uutx, which never vanishes because tx<r<ρ. The centered sphere is a radial deformation retract of Rn{0}. Hence inclusion BKRn{x} induces isomorphisms on reduced homology in all degrees, including the augmentation kernel in degree zero.

F4given
2.1

Choose 0<ϵ<sx. Both B{x} and Rn{x} radially retract about x to the sphere of radius ϵ: hx(y,t)=x+(1t+tϵyx)(yx). For the first space the homotopy lies in B, since it is the segment between y and a point of that small sphere, both in the convex ball B. It avoids x by positivity of the radial coefficient. These retractions commute with inclusion, so that inclusion induces isomorphisms. Factoring the isomorphism of step 1.2 through B{x} proves that BKB{x} induces reduced homology isomorphisms.

F4step 1.2
3.1

The ball B is contractible. As calculated in [F1], the exact sequence [F3] identifies Hn(B,A;R) with H~n1(A;R) for either nonempty subspace A=BK or B{x}. At n=1 this is the kernel of H0(A;R)H0(B;R); no unreduced degree-zero replacement is made. Naturality of the connecting map and step 2.1 therefore prove the desired restriction isomorphism, after step 1.1. Its target is R by [F1].

F1F3step 1.1step 2.1
4.1

If JintK, choose any yintJ. Restriction from K to y factors as restriction from K to J followed by restriction from J to y, by [F5]. Both the composite and the latter map are isomorphisms by step 3.1 applied to the respective charts; hence the first map is an isomorphism. The same factorization holds for every y in the interior of J, proving compatibility without any common-coordinate assumption on the two balls. For n=0 all these balls are singletons; excision reduces their groups and maps to the point group R and its identity, as in [F1].

F1F2F5step 3.1
5.1

The statement requires an actual chart ball, so supplies no ball in an empty manifold. Zero coefficients give isomorphisms of zero modules. The radii have strict inequalities; neither radius zero nor a point on K is claimed. All homotopies include t=0,1 and operate on unnormalized singular chains through [F4]. Only finitely many individual radii, points and charts are used; all comparison maps are canonical inclusions, and no AC is invoked.

F4step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

56 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources