How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Coordinate-ball classes identify local homology stalks
Statement
Let be a boundaryless -manifold, and let a chart contain concentric coordinate balls , where . We identify these sets with their preimages in . For every and commutative unital ring , the map of pairs induces an isomorphism If a closed coordinate ball in any chart lies inside , restriction from to is also an isomorphism and commutes with point restrictions over . In dimension zero use singleton chart balls. No AC is needed.
Facts & Assumptions
Local homology detects manifold dimension, interior, and boundary computes the local group at an interior point as in degree , and gives the point-complex and radial-contraction calculations.
Excision for singular homology identifies local pairs after removing a closed subset lying in the open complement of the support.
Long exact sequence of a pair gives pair connecting maps. Relative connecting homomorphism on cycles identifies their representatives as boundaries of relative cycles, and The long exact homology sequence is natural makes the connecting squares commute for maps of pairs.
Homotopic maps induce the same map on singular homology applies to the explicit radial and translation homotopies below.
Functoriality of relative homology supplies identity and composition laws for restriction maps.
Heine-Borel in : with the Euclidean metric a subset of is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line makes closed coordinate balls compact; In a Hausdorff space a point and a disjoint compact set, and two disjoint compact sets, have disjoint open neighbourhoods; hence every compact subset is closed, and in a compact Hausdorff space the compact subsets are exactly the closed ones makes their images closed in .
Proof
Given: The stated chart, radii, point and coefficient ring. First let and set .
The ball is compact by [F6]; compactness of its chart preimage follows by pulling any open cover back to the Euclidean ball and taking a finite subcover there. It is closed in Hausdorff . Thus is closed and contained in the open set . Excision gives . It gives the analogous isomorphism for , and these identifications commute with the restriction maps since all are induced by inclusions.
Put . The annulus retracts onto by : throughout the homotopy its norm is strictly between and . The inclusion is a homotopy equivalence on homology. Indeed translate the target by ; the resulting map is homotopic to by , which never vanishes because . The centered sphere is a radial deformation retract of . Hence inclusion induces isomorphisms on reduced homology in all degrees, including the augmentation kernel in degree zero.
Choose . Both and radially retract about to the sphere of radius : For the first space the homotopy lies in , since it is the segment between and a point of that small sphere, both in the convex ball . It avoids by positivity of the radial coefficient. These retractions commute with inclusion, so that inclusion induces isomorphisms. Factoring the isomorphism of step 1.2 through proves that induces reduced homology isomorphisms.
The ball is contractible. As calculated in [F1], the exact sequence [F3] identifies with for either nonempty subspace or . At this is the kernel of ; no unreduced degree-zero replacement is made. Naturality of the connecting map and step 2.1 therefore prove the desired restriction isomorphism, after step 1.1. Its target is by [F1].
If , choose any . Restriction from to factors as restriction from to followed by restriction from to , by [F5]. Both the composite and the latter map are isomorphisms by step 3.1 applied to the respective charts; hence the first map is an isomorphism. The same factorization holds for every in the interior of , proving compatibility without any common-coordinate assumption on the two balls. For all these balls are singletons; excision reduces their groups and maps to the point group and its identity, as in [F1].
The statement requires an actual chart ball, so supplies no ball in an empty manifold. Zero coefficients give isomorphisms of zero modules. The radii have strict inequalities; neither radius zero nor a point on is claimed. All homotopies include and operate on unnormalized singular chains through [F4]. Only finitely many individual radii, points and charts are used; all comparison maps are canonical inclusions, and no AC is invoked.
Depends on
- Local homology detects manifold dimension, interior, and boundary
- Excision for singular homology
- Long exact sequence of a pair
- Relative connecting homomorphism on cycles
- The long exact homology sequence is natural
- Homotopic maps induce the same map on singular homology
- Functoriality of relative homology
- Heine-Borel in $\mathbb{R}^n$: with the Euclidean metric a subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line
- In a Hausdorff space a point and a disjoint compact set, and two disjoint compact sets, have disjoint open neighbourhoods; hence every compact subset is closed, and in a compact Hausdorff space the compact subsets are exactly the closed ones
Used by
- Orientation local system and orientation cover Definition
- R-orientation of a topological manifold Definition
- Cap duality on a Euclidean coordinate ball Lemma
- Smooth orientation sign is the local integral homology multiplier Lemma
- Alexander duality for compact locally contractible subsets of a sphere Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
56 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, local orientation comparisons, pp.233–234 (standard reference, not scraped)