Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Strictly feasible DMC input laws achieve every lower mutual-information rate

Statement

Let W be a finite DMC with cost c, feasible budget Γ≥cmin⁡, and cost-constrained information capacity CI(Γ). For every 0≤R<CI(Γ), there are deterministic ordinary codes with rate tending to at least R, average error tending to zero, and average block cost at most Γ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite DMC and cost model, the feasible budget, and a rate R strictly below CI(Γ).

[F1]

Constrained DMC information capacity is attained, nondecreasing, and concave: the constrained maximum is attained, and for Γ>cmin⁡ its value can be approached by input laws of strictly smaller cost.

[F2]

IID DMC information density converges to mutual information: for a fixed finite DMC input law, the normalized IID information density converges in probability to I(PX;W).

[F3]

Threshold decoding bound for memoryless channels with densities: an IID random code's expected average error is bounded by the information-density miss probability plus the threshold false-alarm term.

[F4]

A low-error random code can be pruned to satisfy a strict average cost constraint: if expected cost-violating fraction and ensemble average error both tend to zero, pruning yields feasible deterministic subcodes with vanishing error and vanishing rate loss.

[F5]

Chebyshev's inequality on a finite probability space: a finite random variable V satisfies Pr⁡(∣V−EV∣≥t)≤Var⁡(V)/t2 for t>0.

[F6]

Single-letter information capacity of a finite DMC, Finite DMC information density, and Finite stochastic kernels: the induced law determines mutual information and information density; each finite channel row sums to one.

Proof

1.1F1givencases

If R=0, the one-message code that repeats a minimum-cost symbol has zero error and cost cmin⁡≤Γ. Suppose R>0. If Γ>cmin⁡, [F1] gives an input law PX with cˉ(PX)<Γ and I(PX;W)>R. If Γ=cmin⁡, choose an attaining law from [F1]. Feasibility gives ∑xPX(x)(c(x)−cmin⁡)≤0; every summand is nonnegative, so this law is supported on minimum-cost symbols and its mutual information exceeds R.

2.1F2step 1.1givenalgebra

Choose δ>0 with R+2δ<I(PX;W) and Mn=⌈enR⌉. For the IID input and product DMC, [F2] makes the miss probability at threshold ln⁡(Mn−1)+nδ tend to zero, since the threshold divided by n tends to R+δ<I(PX;W).

3.1A1F3F4F5F6step 1.1step 2.1givencasesalgebra∎

By [F3], the IID random-code ensemble has expected average error an→0. If Γ>cmin⁡, the letter costs are bounded on the finite alphabet, so the variance of their n-letter average is Var⁡(c(X1))/n; [F5] implies the expected fraction qn of codewords whose average cost exceeds Γ tends to zero because Ec(X1)<Γ. Apply [F4] to obtain deterministic subcodes with every retained word feasible, error tending to zero, and rate loss tending to zero. If Γ=cmin⁡, every drawn input letter has minimum cost, so every random codeword has cost exactly Γ and no pruning is needed; [F3] supplies deterministic codes with vanishing error.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources