How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Cotangent spaces commute with localization at a rational point
Statement
Let be a field, let be a commutative -algebra, and let be a maximal ideal whose residue field is via the structure map. Set , , and . Use the conventions and , and similarly for . For every , the canonical map
is an isomorphism. At this is the localization comparison for the intrinsic cotangent space The intrinsic cotangent space.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field , a commutative -algebra , and a maximal ideal such that as a -algebra.
The intrinsic cotangent space: the intrinsic cotangent space at a point is the maximal ideal of its local ring modulo its square, over the residue field.
Localisation at a prime ideal: : for a prime ideal , and its elements are fractions with .
is local with unique maximal ideal : is local with unique maximal ideal .
Ideals of correspond to -saturated ideals of , and prime ideals correspond to primes disjoint from : for an ideal of , its extension is .
Equality, vanishing, and the kernel of the localisation map: in exactly when for some .
The sum and product of two-sided ideals: the product of ideals consists of finite sums of products with and .
Proof
Localization of the powers. If , then in the field , so or ; hence is prime and is multiplicative. By [F2] and [F3], and its maximal ideal is . By [F4], and each extension consists of fractions with numerator in . With the stated recursive convention for powers, [F6] gives for every : it holds for . If it holds at , every element of is a finite sum of products with and , so it lies in . Conversely, writing a numerator in as a finite sum of such products expresses every fraction in as an element of . Therefore is well-defined.
Injectivity. Suppose and . By step 1.1 and [F4], for some and . By [F5], there is with , so . The residue of in the field is nonzero; choose whose residue is its inverse. Then and . Thus and is injective.
Surjectivity and boundary instances. Let a class in be represented, by step 1.1 and [F4], by with and . Choose whose residue is the inverse of the nonzero residue of . Then , and . Hence the class is , proving surjectivity. This covers , where the map is , and , the cotangent-space map of [F1]. If , then : is the identity of and for every both sides are zero. The lifts above are chosen separately for each displayed fraction, so no choice principle is used.
Depends on
- The intrinsic cotangent space
- $R_{\mathfrak p}$ is local with unique maximal ideal $\mathfrak pR_{\mathfrak p}$
- Equality, vanishing, and the kernel of the localisation map
- Localisation at a prime ideal: $R_{\mathfrak p}=(R\setminus\mathfrak p)^{-1}R$
- Ideals of $S^{-1}R$ correspond to $S$-saturated ideals of $R$, and prime ideals correspond to primes disjoint from $S$
- The sum $I+J$ and product $IJ$ of two-sided ideals
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Geometry, v6.10, Ch. 1 §b Lemma 1.15; Ch. 4 §f item 4.30(d) and §g (standard reference, not scraped)