Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-01
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Reduced C prime(1/6) diagrams satisfy the standard combinatorial curvature count

Statement

Let D be a reduced van Kampen diagram with at least one 2-cell over a symmetrised C(1/6) presentation, and assume its outer boundary word is freely reduced and nontrivial. Then some boundary face of D is a shell whose inner boundary is a concatenation of at most three maximal internal arcs.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A reduced van Kampen diagram D with at least one 2-cell over a symmetrised C(1/6) presentation, with freely reduced nontrivial outer boundary word.

[L0]

A nondegenerate van Kampen diagram is a finite combinatorial 2-complex whose underlying space is a closed disc (Van Kampen diagrams, boundary labels, and diagram area for a presentation).

[F1]

The relator set satisfies the strict metric condition C(1/6) (The small-cancellation conditions C(lambda) and C prime(lambda)).

[L1]

The diagram is reduced in the sense that no cancellable adjacent face pair occurs (A reduced van Kampen diagram has no cancellable adjacent faces).

[F2]

Under Section 3.5's standing C(1/6) hypothesis, Touikan first observes that internal arcs of a reduced diagram are labelled by pieces and that every internal face of its arc reduction has at least seven sides; Definition 3.5.3 defines an i-shell, and Proposition 3.5.5 states that an arc-reduced disc diagram contains an i-shell for some 1i3. Independently, Abgrall--Munro Lemma 2.12 states the general Greendlinger form that every nontrivial reduced C(1/6) disc diagram has 3-shells and/or boundary spurs.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If D has exactly one 2-cell, that face has empty inner boundary and is therefore a shell with zero internal arcs. Hence assume that D has at least two faces.

L0given
2.1

Collapse every maximal arc of D---boundary arcs as well as internal arcs---by suppressing its valence-2 internal vertices. The resulting diagram D is an arc-reduced combinatorial disc with the same faces and face incidences. Removing subdivisions neither creates a cancellable face pair nor changes which face-boundary portions are internal or external.

L0L1step 1.1construct
3.1

Every internal edge of D represents a maximal internal arc of D. By reducedness, the two incident face occurrences do not cancel, so [F2] identifies the arc label as a piece. If f is an interior face, these piece-arcs cover f; [F1] makes each one shorter than f/6, so f has at least seven sides. This is exactly the arc-reduced C(1/6) setup preceding the proposition cited in [F2].

F1F2L1step 2.1algebra
4.1

Apply the Touikan proposition cited in [F2] to D. It gives a boundary face whose inner boundary consists of i internal arcs for some 1i3. Expanding the suppressed valence-2 vertices turns those i edges back into the same i maximal internal arcs of D, without changing the face or its outer boundary. Together with the one-face case in step 1.1, this proves the claim.

F2step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources