Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passverified 2026-08-02 (claude-opus-5)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Dedekind reals are Archimedean

Statement

R\mathbb{R} (Dedekind cuts) is Archimedean: for every cut AA there is a natural number nn with A<nA < n^{*}. Equivalently, the rational cuts (n)nN(n^{*})_{n \in \mathbb{N}} are cofinal in R\mathbb{R}: no single cut is an upper bound for all of them.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A cut AA.

[L1]

A cut is a proper subset of Q\mathbb{Q} (AQA \ne \mathbb{Q}), and aAa \in A, bAa<bb \notin A \Rightarrow a < b (Dedekind cut); the elements of R\mathbb{R} are exactly these cuts (The real numbers R\mathbb{R} as Dedekind cuts).

[L2]

Rational Archimedean property: for every qQq \in \mathbb{Q} there is a natural number nn with n>qn > q (The rationals are Archimedean).

[L3]

The embedding preserves order: p<qpqp < q \Rightarrow p^{*} \subsetneq q^{*}, i.e. p<qp^{*} < q^{*} (The rational cuts embed densely in R\mathbb{R}, preserving sums, products, 00, 11 and the order).

[L4]

Inclusion order, and transitivity of << in the totally ordered field (Order on the Dedekind reals, The Dedekind reals form a totally ordered field).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Since AQA \ne \mathbb{Q}, choose a rational qAq \notin A.

L1choose
1.2

By the rational Archimedean property, choose a natural number nn with n>qn > q.

L2choose
2.1

AqA \subseteq q^{*}: for aAa \in A, the separation property gives a<qa < q (as qAq \notin A), so aqa \in q^{*}.

step 1.1L1
2.2

q<nq^{*} < n^{*}: from q<nq < n and order preservation, qnq^{*} \subsetneq n^{*}.

step 1.2L3
3.1

Hence AqnA \subseteq q^{*} \subsetneq n^{*}, so A<nA < n^{*}: the rational cuts are cofinal and R\mathbb{R} is Archimedean.

step 2.1step 2.2L4

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 39 results over 18 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources