Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-08-02 (claude-opus-5)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

For a positive cut A, the reciprocal A−1 satisfies A⋅A−1=1∗

Statement

For A>0∗, the reciprocal A−1 (Multiplication and reciprocals of Dedekind cuts) is a Dedekind cut with A−1>0∗, and A⋅A−1=1∗.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A cut A with A>0∗, and the multiplicative identity 1∗={r∈Q:r<1}.

[L1]

Nonnegative product: for A,B>0∗, A⋅B={q≤0}∪{ab:a∈A, b∈B, a>0, b>0} (Multiplication and reciprocals of Dedekind cuts).

[L2]

Reciprocal: for A>0∗, A−1={p≤0}∪{ p>0:∃ s∈Q, s>0, s∉A, p<1/s } (Multiplication and reciprocals of Dedekind cuts).

[L3]

A>0∗ means A contains a positive rational; and every cut is a proper, downward-closed set of rationals with no greatest element (Order on the Dedekind reals, Dedekind cut).

[L4]

Q is a field: rational addition and multiplication are commutative and associative, multiplication distributes over addition, and every nonzero rational is invertible (The rationals form a field); the order is total, x≤y implies x+z≤y+z, and 0<x, 0<y imply 0<xy (The rationals form a totally ordered field).

[L6]

Every nonempty subset S⊆N has a least element: there is ℓ∈S with ℓ≤s for all s∈S (The well-ordering principle).

[L5]

Rational power growth: for a rational y>1 one has yn≥1+n(y−1) for every natural n≥1, by induction from Q arithmetic — at n=1 both sides are y, and if yn≥1+n(y−1) then, multiplying by y>0 and writing y=1+(y−1), yn+1≥(1+(y−1))(1+n(y−1))=1+(n+1)(y−1)+n(y−1)2≥1+(n+1)(y−1) because n(y−1)2≥0; and by the Archimedean property every rational is exceeded by some such power; since a cut is proper it omits a rational upper bound, so for any a0>0 some a0yn∉A (The rationals are Archimedean, Dedekind cut).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

A−1 is a cut with A−1>0∗: since A>0∗ contains 0 and hence, by downward closure, all rationals ≤0, every s∉A is positive; fix a0∈A with a0>0, so any positive p∈A−1 has p<1/s<1/a0 (its witness s∉A satisfies s>a0), making A−1 proper; it is nonempty (it contains 0) and downward closed: a q≤0 lies in the {p≤0} clause, and if 0<q<p with p∈A−1 carrying witness s (p<1/s) then q<p<1/s, so q∈A−1 with the same witness s; it contains a positive p (take any s∉A and 0<p<1/s), and has no greatest element: a p≤0 is exceeded by the positive element just exhibited, while any positive p∈A−1 carries a witness s>0, s∉A with p<1/s, and the rational p′=(p+1/s)/2 satisfies p<p′<1/s, so p′ lies in A−1 with the same witness s yet p′>p.

L2L3L4
1.2

Inclusion A⋅A−1⊆1∗: any q≤0 in A⋅A−1 lies in 1∗, and if a∈A, p∈A−1 with a,p>0, choose s∉A, s>0, p<1/s, so a<s (as a∈A, s∉A) and ap<s⋅(1/s)=1, giving ap∈1∗.

L1L2L3L4
1.3

For the reverse inclusion fix a target x with 0<x<1: pick a rational t with x<t<1 (betweenness in Q) and set y:=1/t, so y>1; choose a0∈A with a0>0 (as A>0∗); by rational power growth some power a0yn∉A, so { n≥1:a0yn∉A } is a nonempty set of naturals.

L3L4L5
2.1

Let n≥1 be the least natural with a0yn∉A (nonempty by step 1.3; n≥1 since a0y0=a0∈A); by minimality a:=a0yn−1∈A with a>0, while s:=a0yn=a⋅y∉A with s>0.

L4L6step 1.3choose
3.1

Set p:=x/a>0; since x<t=1/y gives 1/x>y, we get 1/p=a/x>a⋅y=s, so p<1/s with s>0, s∉A, whence p∈A−1 by the reciprocal's definition; then x=a⋅p with a∈A, p∈A−1, a,p>0, so x∈A⋅A−1, and with the {q≤0} clause this yields 1∗⊆A⋅A−1.

L1L2L4step 1.1step 1.3step 2.1algebra
4.1

Combining the two inclusions gives A⋅A−1=1∗, and by step 1.1 the reciprocal A−1 is a Dedekind cut with A−1>0∗.

step 1.1step 1.2step 3.1∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources