How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
For a positive cut , the reciprocal satisfies
Statement
For , the reciprocal (Multiplication and reciprocals of Dedekind cuts) is a Dedekind cut with , and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A cut with , and the multiplicative identity .
Nonnegative product: for , (Multiplication and reciprocals of Dedekind cuts).
Reciprocal: for , (Multiplication and reciprocals of Dedekind cuts).
means contains a positive rational; and every cut is a proper, downward-closed set of rationals with no greatest element (Order on the Dedekind reals, Dedekind cut).
is a field: rational addition and multiplication are commutative and associative, multiplication distributes over addition, and every nonzero rational is invertible (The rationals form a field); the order is total, implies , and , imply (The rationals form a totally ordered field).
Every nonempty subset has a least element: there is with for all (The well-ordering principle).
Rational power growth: for a rational one has for every natural , by induction from arithmetic — at both sides are , and if then, multiplying by and writing , because ; and by the Archimedean property every rational is exceeded by some such power; since a cut is proper it omits a rational upper bound, so for any some (The rationals are Archimedean, Dedekind cut).
Proof
is a cut with : since contains and hence, by downward closure, all rationals , every is positive; fix with , so any positive has (its witness satisfies ), making proper; it is nonempty (it contains ) and downward closed: a lies in the clause, and if with carrying witness () then , so with the same witness ; it contains a positive (take any and ), and has no greatest element: a is exceeded by the positive element just exhibited, while any positive carries a witness , with , and the rational satisfies , so lies in with the same witness yet .
Inclusion : any in lies in , and if , with , choose , , , so (as , ) and , giving .
For the reverse inclusion fix a target with : pick a rational with (betweenness in ) and set , so ; choose with (as ); by rational power growth some power , so is a nonempty set of naturals.
Let be the least natural with (nonempty by step 1.3; since ); by minimality with , while with .
Set ; since gives , we get , so with , , whence by the reciprocal's definition; then with , , , so , and with the clause this yields .
Combining the two inclusions gives , and by step 1.1 the reciprocal is a Dedekind cut with .
Depends on
Used by
- The Dedekind reals form a field Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 49 results over 20 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 1 (Appendix: construction of ℝ) (standard reference, not scraped)
- M. Girotti, Addendum — Construction of $\mathbb{R}$ via Dedekind's method (MATH 317, Advanced Calculus of One Variable) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Construction of the real numbers (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)