How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Dedekind's modular law for subgroup products
Statement
Let with . If is a subgroup of , then The equality also holds as an equality of subsets whenever the displayed products are formed; the subgroup hypothesis ensures that both sides are subgroups in later applications.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Subgroups with , and with a subgroup.
A subgroup contains the identity and inverses and is closed under products (Subgroup).
Proof
If , write with and ; then , and gives , so .
If , write with and ; since , one has , hence and .
The two inclusions prove .
Depends on
Used by
- The Zassenhaus butterfly lemma Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 9 results over 9 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Group Theory, Chapter 6 (standard reference, not scraped)
- K. Conrad, Subgroup Series I (standard reference, not scraped)
- K. Igusa, Notes on Jordan-Hölder, section 5 (standard reference, not scraped)