Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedprecheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Every finite group has a composition series

Statement

Every finite group has a composition series (Composition series, composition factors, and composition length). The trivial group has composition length zero.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite group G.

[F1]

A composition series is a finite strictly descending subnormal series whose factors are simple; the trivial group has the length-zero series (Composition series, composition factors, and composition length).

[L1]

For N⊴G, subgroups of G/N correspond to subgroups of G containing N, and normal subgroups correspond under this bijection (Correspondence theorem: subgroups of G/N correspond to subgroups of G containing N, with normality preserved).

Proof

technique · induction
1.1

If ∣G∣=1, the one-term chain G=1 is a composition series of length zero.

F1base
1.2

Assume ∣G∣>1 and that every group of order smaller than ∣G∣ has a composition series.

ih
2.1

The finite nonempty set of proper normal subgroups of G contains 1, so choose one, say N, of maximum cardinality. This is finite maximization and uses no choice principle.

step 1.2choose
3.1

The quotient G/N is simple: a nontrivial proper normal subgroup of G/N would correspond by [L1] to a proper normal subgroup of G strictly containing N, contrary to maximality.

step 2.1L1
3.2

Since N is proper, ∣N∣<∣G∣, so the induction hypothesis supplies a composition series N=N0▹⋯▹Nr=1.

step 1.2step 2.1ih
4.1

Prepending G▹N to the series of step 3.2 gives a strict subnormal series whose new factor G/N is simple by step 3.1 and whose remaining factors are simple by induction; hence it is a composition series of G.

step 3.1step 3.2F1discharge-induction∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources