Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Every finite group has a composition series

Statement

Every finite group has a composition series (Composition series, composition factors, and composition length). The trivial group has composition length zero.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite group G.

[F1]

A composition series is a finite strictly descending subnormal series whose factors are simple; the trivial group has the length-zero series (Composition series, composition factors, and composition length).

[L1]

For NG, subgroups of G/N correspond to subgroups of G containing N, and normal subgroups correspond under this bijection (Correspondence theorem: subgroups of G/N correspond to subgroups of G containing N, with normality preserved).

Proof

technique · induction
1.1

If G=1, the one-term chain G=1 is a composition series of length zero.

F1base
1.2

Assume G>1 and that every group of order smaller than G has a composition series.

ih
2.1

The finite nonempty set of proper normal subgroups of G contains 1, so choose one, say N, of maximum cardinality. This is finite maximization and uses no choice principle.

step 1.2choose
3.1

The quotient G/N is simple: a nontrivial proper normal subgroup of G/N would correspond by [L1] to a proper normal subgroup of G strictly containing N, contrary to maximality.

step 2.1L1
3.2

Since N is proper, N<G, so the induction hypothesis supplies a composition series N=N0Nr=1.

step 1.2step 2.1ih
4.1

Prepending GN to the series of step 3.2 gives a strict subnormal series whose new factor G/N is simple by step 3.1 and whose remaining factors are simple by induction; hence it is a composition series of G.

step 3.1step 3.2F1discharge-induction

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 23 results over 9 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources