Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-09-23 (gpt-6-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Localization gives the stated depth inequality

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice.

Let (R,m) be Noetherian local, let M be finite, and let p∈Spec⁡R. Then depth⁡Rp(Mp)+dim⁡(R/p)≥depth⁡R(M), with the left side infinite when Mp=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice); the data in the statement.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenchoose

The claim is immediate if Mp=0 or if depth⁡M≤dim⁡(R/p). Otherwise the associated-prime dimension bound shows that p is contained in no member of Ass⁡(M). Finite prime avoidance supplies an M-regular x∈p.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

Localizing preserves regularity of x, and quotienting by it lowers both depth⁡M and depth⁡Mp by one. Induction on depth⁡M applied to M/xM proves the inequality after adding one.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources