Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Derived colimit commutes with coefficient change and admissible category change

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (AC) (The Axiom of Choice). For a small category C and a map of commutative rings R→R′ there is a canonical isomorphism Lcolim⁡CopF⊗RLR′≅Lcolim⁡Cop(F⊗RLR′) for bounded-above complexes F of R-module diagrams, where the right-hand scalar extension is computed pointwise (Derived tensor product in the bounded above setting). For a degree-zero pointwise-flat diagram it is ordinary pointwise tensor. If u ⁣:D→C is a functor and W∙ is cosimplicial in D such that Hom⁡D(W∙,V) and Hom⁡C(uW∙,U) are contractible for all V∈D and U∈C, then the canonical change-of-category map Lcolim⁡Dopu∗F⟶Lcolim⁡CopF is an isomorphism for every degree-zero contravariant R-module diagram F.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; small categories C,D; a functor u ⁣:D→C; a ring map R→R′; a bounded-above R-module diagram complex F; a contractible cosimplicial object W∙ in D with uW∙ again contractible against all test objects.

[F1]

F admits a supplied bounded-above projective replacement G∙ whose terms are direct sums of representables; evaluation is exact, colim⁡RU=R, and Lcolim⁡Cop is computed by the bar complex (Module diagrams have projective representables and computable derived colimits).

[F2]

If W∙ is cosimplicial with Hom⁡D(W∙,V) contractible for all V, then for every contravariant module diagram F the complex F(W∙) is canonically isomorphic to Lcolim⁡DopF in D(R) (Contractible cosimplicial evaluation computes diagram derived colimits).

[F3]

Tensoring a bounded-above flat complex with a bounded-above acyclic complex gives an acyclic total complex; hence bounded-above flat complexes preserve quasi-isomorphisms (Bounded above flat tensor complexes preserve quasi isomorphisms).

[F4]

Tensor products commute with arbitrary direct sums of modules, and the bounded-above derived tensor product is represented by tensoring a bounded-above projective replacement (Tensor products commute with arbitrary direct sums, Derived tensor product in the bounded above setting).

Proof

1.1F1F4

Coefficient change on a common model. Choose the supplied representable-sum projective replacement G∙→F of [F1]. Every term Gn evaluates to free R-modules, and its terms are direct sums of the representables RU, whose coefficient extension to R′ is again a direct sum of R′-representables; hence G∙⊗RR′ is a complex of projective R′-module diagrams. At every object, G∙ is a bounded-above complex of free R-modules resolving the value of F, so its ordinary tensor computes the pointwise derived scalar extension by [F4]. Thus the tensor complex is a projective model of F⊗RLR′, without asserting that it resolves ordinary tensor for nonflat values.

1.2F1F2

Change of category. Assume now that W∙ in D and its image uW∙ in C satisfy the contractibility hypotheses. By [F2] applied in D to u∗F and in C to F, both derived colimits are canonically identified with the same complex u∗F(W∙)=F(uW∙): the first is computed by evaluation on W∙ and the second by evaluation on uW∙, and these complexes are equal because (u∗F)(V)=F(uV). The canonical change-of-category map is induced by applying u to the chains of the bar description of [F1], so under these identifications it is the identity; being an identification of the canonical models, it is an isomorphism independent of the chosen replacements. This makes precise that the comparison is canonical and not an arbitrary isomorphism of isomorphic objects.

2.1F1F3F4step 1.1

The comparison of derived colimits. By [F4], tensoring commutes with direct sums and with the quotient relations presenting a colimit (a linear map out of either quotient is the same compatible family of balanced pairings), so colim⁡(G∙⊗RR′)≅(colim⁡G∙)⊗RR′. Every term of colim⁡G∙ is free over R, because colim⁡RU=R by [F1] and colimit commutes with direct sums, so the colimit of a direct sum of representables is a direct sum of copies of R; therefore (colim⁡G∙)⊗RR′ also represents the derived scalar extension of colim⁡G∙. By [F1] applied over R and over R′, the left side of the displayed isomorphism is (colim⁡G∙)⊗RLR′ and the right side is colim⁡(G∙⊗RR′), and the two are equal on the common model; independence of the replacement is [F3].

3.1step 2.1

Pointwise-flat diagrams. If F is degree-zero and pointwise flat, tensoring the exact resolution G∙→F with R′ value by value is exact, so the derived scalar extension of every value is its ordinary tensor; hence the coefficient isomorphism of step 2.1 is the ordinary pointwise tensor.

4.1F1F2given∎

Scope. All tensors in the proof are ordinary module-diagram derived tensors over the fixed commutative rings R,R′; no simplicial-ring model structure, Quillen adjunction or monoidal enhancement is assumed. AC is used exactly through the supplied projective replacements and the contractible-cosimplicial evaluation lemmas [F1] and [F2].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

30 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources