How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Dimension shift for a cohomological delta functor effaced in the middle
Statement
Let be a cohomological delta functor. For a short exact sequence and an integer , the connecting map has the following properties:
- if is the zero map, then is a monomorphism,
- if is the zero map, then is an epimorphism,
- if both conditions hold, then is an isomorphism.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A short exact sequence and an integer .
A cohomological delta functor attaches an exact segment to the given short exact sequence (Cohomological delta functor).
Proof
By [L1], the kernel of is the image of . If that map is zero, then , so is monic.
By [L1], the image of is the kernel of . If the latter map is zero, this kernel is all of , so is epic.
When both hypotheses hold, steps 1.1 and 1.2 show that is an isomorphism.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Section 12.12: Cohomological delta-functors (standard reference, not scraped)
- Romyar Sharifi, Homological Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)