Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A finite-grid Poincare inequality for zero endpoint values

Statement

Let N≥2, h>0, L=Nh, and let w=(w0,…,wN) be a complex grid function with w0=wN=0. Then ∥w∥h≤L∥D+w∥e,h.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A complex grid function w on j=0,…,N with zero endpoint values.

[F1]

The weighted interior and edge norms are those of Uniform periodic, infinite, and Dirichlet grid conventions.

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

For each 1≤j≤N−1, put di=wi+1−wi for i=0,…,j−1. Expanding both expressions shows j∑i=0j−1∣di∣2−∣∑i=0j−1di∣2=∑0≤i<r<j∣di−dr∣2, since each side equals (j−1)∑i∣di∣2−∑i<r(didr‾+drdi‾). The right side is nonnegative. Since w0=0, wj=∑i=0j−1di, so ∣wj∣2≤j∑i=0j−1∣wi+1−wi∣2≤N∑i=0N−1∣wi+1−wi∣2.

2.1step 1.1F1algebra∎

Sum the step 1.1 bound over j=1,…,N−1 and multiply by h. Since (N−1)Nh≤N2h and ∥D+w∥e,h2=h−1∑i=0N−1∣wi+1−wi∣2, we obtain ∥w∥h2≤N2h2∥D+w∥e,h2=L2∥D+w∥e,h2. Taking nonnegative square roots proves the claim.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources