How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A finite-grid Poincare inequality for zero endpoint values
Statement
Let , , , and let be a complex grid function with . Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A complex grid function on with zero endpoint values.
The weighted interior and edge norms are those of Uniform periodic, infinite, and Dirichlet grid conventions.
Proof
For each , put for . Expanding both expressions shows since each side equals . The right side is nonnegative. Since , , so
Sum the step 1.1 bound over and multiply by . Since and , we obtain . Taking nonnegative square roots proves the claim.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Endre Süli, B6.1 Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations (standard reference, not scraped)