Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Smooth consistency orders for the five periodic advection stencils

Statement

Fix a∈R∖{0}. Let u:R2→R be a C6 solution of ut+aux=0 that is periodic in x with period P>0, so u(x+P,t)=u(x,t), and whose derivatives through order six are bounded. Let h,k→0 with 0<c−≤k/h≤c+<∞, and put ν=∣a∣k/h. For a stencil S, define its local residual by τS(x,t)=u(x,t+k)−S(u(⋅,t))(x)k. Then, for the sign-selected stencils of Periodic advection schemes and the finite-interval upwind row, the upwind, downwind, centered, and Lax--Friedrichs residuals are O(h) uniformly in (x,t), while the Lax--Wendroff residual is O(h2). Here a remainder R=O(η(h,k)) uniformly means ∣R(x,t;h,k)∣≤Cη(h,k) for all x,t and sufficiently small h,k, with C independent of x,t,h,k under the stated ratio bounds. These are smooth-solution consistency statements and imply no convergence result at discontinuities.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The stated smooth solution, fixed nonzero speed a, and two-sided mesh ratio c−≤k/h≤c+.

[F1]

The five periodic stencils use the stated sign convention for a>0 and are reflected by j↦−j for a<0, with ν=∣a∣k/h (Periodic advection schemes and the finite-interval upwind row).

[F2]

If derivatives through order m+1 are bounded on the segment, the order-m Taylor polynomial has a remainder bounded by the derivative bound times the corresponding power divided by (m+1)! (A uniform derivative bound gives a uniform Taylor remainder bound).

[F3]

For a function on an open subset of R2, C6 means that every iterated partial derivative of total order at most six exists and is continuous (Ck maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space).

[F4]

For a Ck function, iterated partial derivatives of order k are unchanged by permuting the coordinate differentiations (Continuous mixed partials of order k are invariant under permutations).

Proof

1.1givenF1F3constructalgebra

If a<0, set A=−a>0 and u~(x,t)=u(−x,t). For fixed x, its time difference quotient is that of u at (−x,t), so u~t(x,t)=ut(−x,t). In its spatial difference quotient, substitute s=−h to get u~x(x,t)=−ux(−x,t). Repeating these coordinate calculations gives ∂xp∂tqu~(x,t)=(−1)p(∂xp∂tqu)(−x,t), so the period and derivative bounds are preserved. The PDE gives u~t+Au~x=ut(−x,t)−Aux(−x,t)=0. The definition's reflection j↦−j identifies each negative-speed stencil residual with the corresponding positive-speed residual of u~ at the reflected point. If a>0, take A=a and u~=u. It is therefore enough to derive the estimates for positive speed A.

2.1givenF2F3F4step 1.1algebra

For this positive-speed solution, differentiating u~t=−Au~x in t and x, then using [F4] to commute the order-two mixed partials, gives u~tt=−Au~xt=−Au~tx=A2u~xx. Differentiating this identity in t and the PDE twice in x, then using [F4] to commute the order-three partials, gives u~ttt=A2u~xxt=A2u~txx=−A3u~xxx. By [F3] these derivatives exist, and the bounded derivatives in the hypotheses make the Taylor remainders uniform. Taylor's formula from [F2] yields u~(x,t+k)−u~(x,t)k=u~t+k2u~tt+k26u~ttt+O(k3), u~(x+h,t)−u~(x−h,t)2h=u~x+h26u~xxx+O(h4),u~(x+h,t)−2u~(x,t)+u~(x−h,t)h2=u~xx+h212u~xxxx+O(h4). The one-sided expansions are (u~(x,t)−u~(x−h,t))/h=u~x−h2u~xx+O(h2) and (u~(x+h,t)−u~(x,t))/h=u~x+h2u~xx+O(h2).

3.1F1step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Substituting the step 2.1 expansions into [F1] with speed A=∣a∣ and using u~t+Au~x=0 gives τup=k2u~tt−Ah2u~xx+O(k2+h2),τdown=k2u~tt+Ah2u~xx+O(k2+h2),τcentered=k2u~tt+O(k2+h2). For Lax--Friedrichs the symmetric average contributes −h2u~xx/(2k) to the residual, so τLF=k2u~tt−h22ku~xx+O(k2+h2+h4/k). For Lax--Wendroff the ku~tt/2 term cancels the second-difference term by u~tt=A2u~xx, leaving τLW=k26u~ttt+Ah26u~xxx+O(k3+h4+kh2). Reflection in step 1.1 transfers these residual bounds to the negative-speed branch.

4.1givenstep 1.1step 3.1algebra∎

The mesh ratio bounds imply k=O(h) and h2/k=O(h). Thus the first four residuals are uniformly O(h), and every displayed Lax--Wendroff term is O(h2) or smaller. By step 1.1 the same estimates hold for either velocity sign. The conclusion concerns only the sampled smooth solution in the stated periodic setting.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources