Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Elementary predictable counting-process integrals are martingales

Statement

Let M be any square-integrable martingale on [0,T], and let H be a bounded predictable step integrand on a deterministic partition. The elementary integral (It(H))0≤t≤T of Elementary predictable integral against a counting-process martingale is a square-integrable martingale.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite-horizon square-integrable martingale M=N−A and a bounded step integrand Hj∈Ftj on a deterministic partition.

[F1]

A square-integrable all-pairs martingale is adapted, integrable, and satisfies the conditional-expectation identity at every time pair. (Continuous-time adapted processes and martingales)

[F2]

The elementary integral is the finite sum of the step coefficients times the corresponding increments of M. (Elementary predictable integral against a counting-process martingale)

[F3]

A bounded measurable factor known at time u can be taken out of conditional expectation given Fu. (Taking out what is known)

[A1]

AC is inherited through the continuous-time conditional-expectation definition. (The Axiom of Choice)

Proof

1.1F1F2givenalgebra

Each summand in [F2] is Ft-measurable at its current endpoint. It is square-integrable because Hj is bounded and each martingale increment is in L2. A finite sum is therefore adapted and square-integrable at every t≤T.

2.1A1F1F3step 1.1given∎

Fix 0≤s≤t≤T and B∈Fs. Refine the original deterministic partition by inserting s and t. After subtracting Is(H) from It(H), each remaining piece has the form Hj(Mv−Mu) on an interval (u,v] with u≥s and tj≤u. Thus 1BHj is bounded and Fu-measurable. Since E[Mv−Mu∣Fu]=0, [F3] gives E[1BHj(Mv−Mu)]=0. Summing the finitely many pieces yields E[1B(It(H)−Is(H))]=0. The event-integral characterization of conditional expectation proves E[It(H)∣Fs]=Is(H). Thus the elementary integral is a square-integrable martingale.

Source notes

Tian states the bounded predictable-integral martingale result on Unit 10 p. 5 and refers its proof to Fleming–Harrington. Bass constructs the same step integral for jump martingales. The event-testing argument above supplies the complete finite-sum proof used here.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources