How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Elementary predictable counting-process integrals are martingales
Statement
Let be any square-integrable martingale on , and let be a bounded predictable step integrand on a deterministic partition. The elementary integral of Elementary predictable integral against a counting-process martingale is a square-integrable martingale.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite-horizon square-integrable martingale and a bounded step integrand on a deterministic partition.
A square-integrable all-pairs martingale is adapted, integrable, and satisfies the conditional-expectation identity at every time pair. (Continuous-time adapted processes and martingales)
The elementary integral is the finite sum of the step coefficients times the corresponding increments of . (Elementary predictable integral against a counting-process martingale)
A bounded measurable factor known at time can be taken out of conditional expectation given . (Taking out what is known)
AC is inherited through the continuous-time conditional-expectation definition. (The Axiom of Choice)
Proof
Each summand in [F2] is -measurable at its current endpoint. It is square-integrable because is bounded and each martingale increment is in . A finite sum is therefore adapted and square-integrable at every .
Fix and . Refine the original deterministic partition by inserting and . After subtracting from , each remaining piece has the form on an interval with and . Thus is bounded and -measurable. Since , [F3] gives . Summing the finitely many pieces yields . The event-integral characterization of conditional expectation proves . Thus the elementary integral is a square-integrable martingale.
Source notes
Tian states the bounded predictable-integral martingale result on Unit 10 p. 5 and refers its proof to Fleming–Harrington. Bass constructs the same step integral for jump martingales. The event-testing argument above supplies the complete finite-sum proof used here.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lu Tian, STAT331 Unit 10: Combining Martingales, Stochastic Integrals, and Applications, PDF p. 5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Richard F. Bass, SDEs with Jumps, Section 2.5, PDF p. 5 (standard reference, not scraped)