How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Isometry for elementary predictable counting-process integrals
Statement
Under the finite-horizon contract, for every bounded predictable step integrand , the elementary process is a square-integrable martingale and The terminal class is independent of the chosen finite-step representation of the same integrand in the compensator seminorm.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A simple counting-process contract , the martingale , and a bounded predictable step integrand on a finite deterministic partition.
is square-integrable, and is an integrable martingale on the finite horizon. (Simple counting-process intensity and compensator contract Brackets of a compensated simple counting process)
The elementary integral is the finite sum of coefficients times martingale increments. (Elementary predictable integral against a counting-process martingale)
If is integrable, a bounded -measurable factor can be taken out of conditional expectation given . The same holds for a finite real such when is integrable; then is integrable too. (Taking out what is known)
The elementary integral process is a square-integrable martingale. (Elementary predictable counting-process integrals are martingales)
Products of two random variables are integrable by Cauchy–Schwarz. (Cauchy-Schwarz for random variables)
AC is inherited through the conditional-expectation interface. (The Axiom of Choice)
Proof
On each , write and . The martingale gives ; expand the left square as . Since and are in , their product is integrable by [F5], so [F3] applies with the possibly unbounded factor . Use to get . By [F3], .
If , then is -measurable and its product with is integrable by boundedness of and [F5]; [F3] and give . Expanding the finite-sum square [F2], all off-diagonal terms vanish, and step 1.1 gives ; the martingale assertion is [F4].
If two step representations agree in the compensator seminorm, their difference has seminorm zero; applying the isometry in step 2.1 to the refined difference representation makes the squared norm of their terminal-integral difference zero, so they define the same terminal class.
Source notes
Tian’s Unit 9, PDF p. 12, states the scalar bracket result. Unit 10, Theorems 12.3–12.4, PDF pp. 5 and 12, states the bounded predictable-integral martingale and integral-bracket results, referring full proofs to Fleming–Harrington; Theorem 12.4 additionally assumes bounded . The local finite-step proof here uses the stated square-integrable model contract without that extra boundedness assumption. Bass describes the same completion route for jump martingales. The conditional-variance and orthogonal-increment calculation above supplies the finite-step proof.
Depends on
- Simple counting-process intensity and compensator contract
- Elementary predictable integral against a counting-process martingale
- Elementary predictable counting-process integrals are martingales
- Brackets of a compensated simple counting process
- Taking out what is known
- Cauchy-Schwarz for random variables
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
- One exponential event: compensator and isometry Example
- L² extension of the predictable counting-process integral Theorem
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Elementary predictable integral against a counting-process martingale.
Dependency tree · two levels
26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lu Tian, STAT331 Unit 9: Some Key Results for Counting Process Martingales, PDF p. 12 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Lu Tian, STAT331 Unit 10: Combining Martingales, Stochastic Integrals, and Applications, Theorems 12.3–12.4, PDF pp. 5 and 12 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Richard F. Bass, SDEs with Jumps, Section 2.5, PDF p. 5 (standard reference, not scraped)