How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
One exponential event: compensator and isometry
Example
Let with , , and , for . On the compensator and martingale are They satisfy the finite-horizon model contract, and the constant step integrand gives
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , a waiting time with density on and tail , the natural filtration , and a finite horizon .
Predictability is measurability for the sigma-algebra generated by , , and time-zero sets; it is preserved under pointwise limits and products, and is predictable for a stopping time . (Progressively measurable and predictable processes)
The model contract requires to be a square-integrable martingale and . (Simple counting-process intensity and compensator contract)
For bounded predictable step , the elementary integral isometry gives . (Isometry for elementary predictable counting-process integrals)
Under the stated contract, and . (Brackets of a compensated simple counting process)
AC is inherited through conditional expectation in the martingale interface. (The Axiom of Choice)
Verification
The process has one unit jump and . For , is predictable by dyadic left-step approximation, while its time-zero value is predictable on the time-zero generator. Therefore is continuous, increasing, starts at zero, and is adapted by left Riemann sums; continuous adapted left-step approximations make it predictable by [F1]. The exponential density gives , verifying the compensator hypotheses in [F2].
Fix . On both and have stopped changing, so . On , ; with , the conditional event increment is , and the residual exponential density gives the same compensator increment . Thus for every pair, and makes square-integrable and verifies [F2].
The process on and is a bounded predictable step integrand with elementary integral . By [F3], ; by [F4], its optional and predictable brackets are and .
Source notes
Tian's Units 8–9 use the one-event exponential model to illustrate the compensator and bracket. The calculations here verify the all-pairs martingale contract directly and use the locally proved elementary isometry.
Depends on
- Simple counting-process intensity and compensator contract
- Optional and predictable brackets for counting-process martingales
- Elementary predictable integral against a counting-process martingale
- Brackets of a compensated simple counting process
- Isometry for elementary predictable counting-process integrals
- Progressively measurable and predictable processes
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lu Tian, STAT331 Unit 8: Lebesgue-Stieltjes Integrals, Martingales, Counting Processes, PDF pp. 12–14 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Lu Tian, STAT331 Unit 9: Some Key Results for Counting Process Martingales, PDF pp. 5–6, 11–13 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Richard F. Bass, SDEs with Jumps, Section 2.5, PDF p. 5 (standard reference, not scraped)