Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Simple counting-process intensity and compensator contract

Definition

Assume the Axiom of Choice The Axiom of Choice. Fix a finite horizon T>0, a probability space (Ω,F,P) and a continuous-time filtration (Ft)0≤t≤T in the all-pairs convention of Continuous-time filtrations and all-pairs martingales. A simple unit-jump counting process is an adapted, càdlàg (right-continuous with left limits), nondecreasing, integer-valued process N with N0=0, NT<∞ almost surely, and ΔNt∈{0,1} for every 0<t≤T outside one null event; here ΔNt:=Nt−Nt−.

An at-risk process is a predictable process Y:[0,T]×Ω→{0,1}, and an intensity density is a finite, nonnegative predictable process λ. Form the Lebesgue integral At:=∫0tYsλs ds,0≤t≤T. For this model and every nonnegative predictable process G, define the pathwise energy integral by ∫0tGs dAs:=∫0tGsYsλs ds,t≤T. The continuous intensity compensator contract requires the defining integral for A to be finite pathwise, and requires A to be continuous, adapted and predictable with A0=0, and that E[AT]<∞. Set Mt:=Nt−At. The model contract is the additional hypothesis that M is a square-integrable martingale relative to the stated filtration. Under this contract A is a continuous predictable compensator of N.

The displayed intensity density alone does not assert that N−A is a martingale, that such a process exists for a given N, or that the contract follows from an empirical observation scheme. No general compensator-existence theorem is included here. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the continuous-time martingale and conditional-expectation interfaces; no further choice is used to state the model contract.

Source notes

Tian's Unit 8 sets up the one-event process, at-risk indicator and integrated hazard; Andersen–Borgan–Gill–Keiding define the counting-process compensator as a predictable finite-variation process for which N−A is a local martingale. This library contract strengthens that model clause to a square-integrable martingale and imposes E[AT]<∞ for the isometry developed below. It makes no existence claim from an intensity formula.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources