Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

L² extension of the predictable counting-process integral

Statement

For every predictable H on [0,T] with E∫0THs2 dAs<∞, the limit in L² counting-process integral when the limit exists exists at each t≤T, is independent of the approximating step sequence, and defines a square-integrable martingale. It satisfies, for each t≤T, E(∫0tHs dMs)2=E∫0tHs2 dAs.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite-horizon counting-process contract, a predictable real H, and finite energy E∫0THs2dAs<∞.

[F1]

Bounded predictable step integrals are martingales and satisfy the elementary isometry. (Isometry for elementary predictable counting-process integrals)

[F2]

Bounded predictable step processes are dense in the compensator L2 norm. (Predictable step processes are dense for the compensator L² norm)

[F3]

L2 is complete for each measure space, including (Ω,Ft,P∣Ft); thus an L2-Cauchy sequence of Ft-measurable classes has an Ft-measurable limit. (Riesz-Fischer completeness of Lp for 1≤p≤∞)

[F4]

Conditional expectation is an L2 contraction. (Conditional lp contraction)

[F5]

The integral notation denotes the L2 limits of elementary integrals when those limits exist. (L² counting-process integral when the limit exists)

[A1]

AC is inherited from the conditional-expectation and L2 interfaces. (The Axiom of Choice)

Proof

1.1A1F1F2F3givenchoose

By [F2], choose bounded predictable step processes Hn with E∫0T∣Hn−H∣2dA→0. For any m,n, [F1] gives E∣IT(Hn)−IT(Hm)∣2=E∫0T∣Hn−Hm∣2dA, so terminal integrals are Cauchy in L2(P); the same estimate on [0,t] gives the Cauchy property at every t≤T. [F3] gives a unique full-space limit and, since every It(Hn) is Ft-measurable, also an Ft-measurable limit at each fixed t; uniqueness makes these the same L2 class.

2.1F1F2F5step 1.1

If Kn is another step sequence converging to H, then E∫0T∣Hn−Kn∣2dA→0. Applying [F1] to Hn−Kn makes the terminal limits and each fixed-time limit equal in L2, so the limits in [F5] are independent of approximation.

2.2F1step 1.1algebra

Norm continuity and [F1] give, for every t≤T, E∣It(H)∣2=lim⁡nE∣It(Hn)∣2=lim⁡nE∫0tHn,s2dAs=E∫0tHs2dAs. This proves square integrability and the isometry.

3.1A1F1F4step 1.1step 2.1∎

For s≤t, [F1] gives E[It(Hn)∣Fs]=Is(Hn). By [F4], conditional expectations converge in L2 to E[It(H)∣Fs], while Is(Hn)→Is(H) in L2 by step 1.1; uniqueness of limits yields E[It(H)∣Fs]=Is(H). Hence the extension is a square-integrable martingale, with no claim for predictable integrands of infinite compensator energy.

Source notes

Bass describes the L2 completion for predictable jump-martingale integrands; Tian states the counting-process martingale and bracket results. The local density lemma and elementary isometry above provide the full completion proof for the finite-energy domain used here.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by L² counting-process integral when the limit exists.

Dependency tree · two levels

36 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources