How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Optional and predictable brackets for counting-process martingales
Definition
Work on the finite horizon of Simple counting-process intensity and compensator contract. For càdlàg (right-continuous with left limits) finite-variation processes starting at zero, with and , define their optional quadratic covariation by and write . The series is absolutely convergent because each path has finite variation. This is the jump-sum convention for optional brackets used on this page.
For a square-integrable model martingale from Simple counting-process intensity and compensator contract, a continuous predictable bracket is a continuous, predictable, increasing process with , , and a martingale, when such a process exists. For two square-integrable model martingales and from that contract, a continuous predictable cross bracket is a continuous, predictable finite-variation process with , , and a martingale, when such a process exists. The uniqueness lemma below fixes the meaning of “the” bracket in this continuous compensator class. No general bracket-existence theorem is asserted. The Axiom of Choice is inherited through the model martingale's conditional-expectation interface; this definition makes no further choice.
Source notes
Tian states the continuous-compensator bracket identities for counting process martingales and explicitly refers their general proofs elsewhere. Bass gives the jump-square convention and product formula for semimartingales with jumps. The local results below prove the particular existence and identities required by this page.
Depends on
Used by
- A tied jump produces a nonzero cross bracket Example
- One exponential event: compensator and isometry Example
- Finite-variation integration by parts for counting-process martingales Lemma
- Uniqueness of continuous predictable brackets Lemma
- Brackets of a compensated simple counting process Theorem
- Cross brackets vanish without simultaneous jumps Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lu Tian, STAT331 Unit 9: Some Key Results for Counting Process Martingales, PDF pp. 10–12 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Richard F. Bass, SDEs with Jumps, Section 2.4, PDF pp. 4–6 (standard reference, not scraped)