How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Elementary ideals are independent of the presentation
Statement
Let be a commutative ring and let be a finitely presented -module. Then for every the elementary ideal of Elementary ideals of a finitely presented module is independent of the chosen finite presentation of ; in particular it is an invariant of the isomorphism class of , and isomorphic modules have the same elementary ideals.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring , a finitely presented -module and an integer . No choice principle is used.
For a presentation with finite, is the ideal generated by all minors of , with for and for (Elementary ideals of a finitely presented module).
For a finitely generated module presented as with finite and arbitrary, the ideal generated by the minors depends only on and the fixed integer , not on the presentation; it is written . The conventions are for and when there are no minors. In particular the minor size changes when the number of presentation generators changes. Fitting ideals are compatible with base change (Fitting ideals do not depend on a presentation).
A finitely presented module is finitely generated and admits a presentation with finite; the cokernel of the presentation map is (Finitely presented modules and finitely presented algebras, Module homomorphism and isomorphism, kernel, image and cokernel, Generated submodule, cyclic and finitely generated modules, module basis and free module).
An isomorphism of -modules carries a presentation to the presentation with the same presentation matrix; hence isomorphic modules admit presentations with identical matrices. [F3, given]
Proof
Identification with the Fitting indexing. Given a finite presentation of with presentation matrix of size , [F1] defines as the ideal generated by the minors of , with the values for and when exceeds the number of columns. This is exactly the ideal of [F2] for the same presentation (whose index set is finite of size ), including both conventions; hence for every finite presentation of .
Independence and isomorphism invariance. By [F2] the value is independent of the presentation, so by step 1.1 is independent of the chosen finite presentation. If is an isomorphism, [F4] transports any finite presentation of to one of with the same matrix, so the two ideals agree. This proves the statement.
Depends on
- Elementary ideals of a finitely presented module
- Fitting ideals do not depend on a presentation
- Finitely presented modules and finitely presented algebras
- Module homomorphism and isomorphism, kernel, image and cokernel
- Generated submodule, cyclic and finitely generated modules, module basis and free module
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Section 15.8 (Tag 07Z6): Fitting ideals; Lemma 15.8.2 (independence of the presentation) (standard reference, not scraped)