How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An irregularity witness raises the pair energy by more than
Statement
Let have order , let be nonempty, and suppose that , witness that is not -regular. If and after empty cells are omitted, then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An irregular pair and witness sets as in the Statement.
Such witnesses satisfy , , and (-regular pairs and self-regular vertex sets).
Pair energy is the product-size-weighted mean square of the densities of the refined subpairs (The mean-square density, or energy, of a vertex partition).
Proof
Choose uniformly from , and let be the density between the cells of and containing and . Double-counting gives , and [L2] identifies with .
Therefore the energy gain in the Statement is .
On the event , which has probability by [L1], the random variable equals and differs from its mean by more than .
Restricting the nonnegative expectation in step 2.1 to this event gives a strict lower bound , which is the asserted boost.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 6 results over 6 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Y. Zhao, Graph Theory and Additive Combinatorics, Lemma 2.1.13 (standard reference, not scraped)