Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Expander walk contraction

Statement

Fix a finite d-regular adjacency-slot multigraph on n≥1 vertices, with normalized adjacency M, and put α=∥M∣1⊥∥ as in Spectral edge and vertex expansion.

A walk that at each step chooses one of the d ports uniformly has transition matrix M and stationary uniform law u=1/n. For any initial probability vector p and integer t≥0, using the ordinary Euclidean norm, ∥Mtp−u∥2≤αt∥p−u∥2,TV⁡(Mtp,u)≤n2αt. For t=0 the factor α0 is interpreted as one. For t≥1, the adjacency-slot power has nontrivial norm αt. Here total variation means half the ℓ1 distance.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the objects and hypotheses in the statement above.

[F1]

For the regular multigraph and spectral conventions in the stated convention, put α=∥M∣1⊥∥. For n≥2 order the eigenvalues 1=μ1≥μ2≥⋯≥μn, counting multiplicity, and put γ=1−μ2. Thus α=max⁡j≥2∣μj∣, which also controls negative eigenvalues. Write cut⁡(S)=∑u∈S,v∉SAuv and ∂VS={v∉S:Auv>0 for some u∈S}. Normalized edge expansion and external vertex expansion are h=min⁡0<∣S∣≤n/2cut⁡(S)d∣S∣,hV=min⁡0<∣S∣≤n/2∣∂VS∣∣S∣. For n=1, put α=0 and leave μ2,γ,h,hV undefined; cut-expansion assertions are vacuous. A bounded-degree family is an expander family when its normalized edge expansion has a positive uniform lower bound for n≥2. Polynomial-time constructibility means a uniform algorithm outputs the adjacency list in time polynomial in n; neighbor computation in time polynomial in log⁡n is a stronger requirement. (Spectral edge and vertex expansion).

[F2]

For vectors u,v in a real or complex inner product space, ∣⟨u,v⟩∣≤∥u∥∥v∥. Equality holds if and only if u and v are linearly dependent, including the case in which either vector is zero. (Cauchy–Schwarz: ∣⟨u,v⟩∣≤∥u∥∥v∥, with equality exactly for linearly dependent vectors).

Proof

1.1F1

There are Avw slots leading from v to w, so one-step transition probability is Mvw. Symmetry and row sums imply column sums one, hence stationarity of u. Starting uniformly, all ndt port walks of length t have equal probability.

1.2F1F2

Since p−u is mean zero, applying the operator norm bound t times gives the Euclidean contraction (the common normalization of inner products cancels). Moreover ∥p−u∥22=∑pv2−1/n≤1. Cauchy–Schwarz bounds ∥q∥1≤n∥q∥2, giving the total variation assertion. At t=0 the norm inequality is equality before the last bound; at n=1 the difference is zero.

2.1step 1.2algebra∎

Matrix multiplication counts port walks, so normalized adjacency of the power is Mt. On an orthonormal mean-zero eigenbasis its eigenvalues are μjt; for t≥1 their largest absolute value is αt. The zero-dimensional case has both sides zero. The estimate allows α=1 and asserts convergence only when α<1.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources